PURPOSE: Both blood and toenail selenium are used to assess selenium exposure in epidemiologic studies. Little is known about the relationship of these biomarkers with each other or about whether there are differences in the relationships of these biomarkers with diet, supplement use, or participant characteristics. METHODS: Data are from 220 participants in a large cohort study of supplement use and cancer risk. Measures of selenium exposure included supplement use (current and 10-year) from a self-administered questionnaire, an inventory of currently used supplements (multivitamins and single supplements), dietary intake from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and selenium concentration in toenails and plasma. RESULTS: Plasma and toenail selenium concentrations were significantly correlated (r=.56 [95% confidence interval: .46, .64]). Supplemental selenium was the strongest predictor of both selenium biomarkers, and these associations were slightly stronger when based on the supplement inventory and 10-year self-reported use compared to current self-reported use. Correlations of current and 10-year questionnaire dose and inventory dose with toenail selenium were .26, .36, and .33; for plasma selenium, these were .27, .36, and .36. Neither dietary selenium nor any participant characteristics, except smoking, was related to either biomarker. Current smokers had lower toenail, but not plasma, selenium levels compared to nonsmokers (.89 versus 1.03 microg/g, p = .03); however, the difference was not significant after control for supplement use (p = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Both toenail and plasma selenium levels similarly reflect selenium intake exposure. There do not appear to be independent associations of toenail or plasma selenium with FFQ-derived selenium intakes, health-related behaviors, or demographic characteristics.
PURPOSE: Both blood and toenail selenium are used to assess selenium exposure in epidemiologic studies. Little is known about the relationship of these biomarkers with each other or about whether there are differences in the relationships of these biomarkers with diet, supplement use, or participant characteristics. METHODS: Data are from 220 participants in a large cohort study of supplement use and cancer risk. Measures of selenium exposure included supplement use (current and 10-year) from a self-administered questionnaire, an inventory of currently used supplements (multivitamins and single supplements), dietary intake from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and selenium concentration in toenails and plasma. RESULTS: Plasma and toenail selenium concentrations were significantly correlated (r=.56 [95% confidence interval: .46, .64]). Supplemental selenium was the strongest predictor of both selenium biomarkers, and these associations were slightly stronger when based on the supplement inventory and 10-year self-reported use compared to current self-reported use. Correlations of current and 10-year questionnaire dose and inventory dose with toenail selenium were .26, .36, and .33; for plasma selenium, these were .27, .36, and .36. Neither dietary selenium nor any participant characteristics, except smoking, was related to either biomarker. Current smokers had lower toenail, but not plasma, selenium levels compared to nonsmokers (.89 versus 1.03 microg/g, p = .03); however, the difference was not significant after control for supplement use (p = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Both toenail and plasma selenium levels similarly reflect selenium intake exposure. There do not appear to be independent associations of toenail or plasma selenium with FFQ-derived selenium intakes, health-related behaviors, or demographic characteristics.
Authors: Marco Vinceti; Gabriele Dennert; Catherine M Crespi; Marcel Zwahlen; Maree Brinkman; Maurice P A Zeegers; Markus Horneber; Roberto D'Amico; Cinzia Del Giovane Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-03-30
Authors: Wisanti Laohaudomchok; Xihong Lin; Robert F Herrick; Shona C Fang; Jennifer M Cavallari; David C Christiani; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Marilyn C Cornelis; Myriam Fornage; Millennia Foy; Pengcheng Xun; Vadim N Gladyshev; Steve Morris; Daniel I Chasman; Frank B Hu; Eric B Rimm; Peter Kraft; Joanne M Jordan; Dariush Mozaffarian; Ka He Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Yumie Takata; Irena B King; Johanna W Lampe; Raymond F Burk; Kristina E Hill; Regina M Santella; Alan R Kristal; David J Duggan; Thomas L Vaughan; Ulrike Peters Journal: J Nutr Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Alexandra Connelly-Frost; Charles Poole; Jessie A Satia; Lawrence L Kupper; Robert C Millikan; Robert S Sandler Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: June M Chan; William K Oh; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Meir J Stampfer; Irena B King; Miyako Abe; Philip W Kantoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: André F S Amaral; Kenneth P Cantor; Debra T Silverman; Núria Malats Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 4.254