Literature DB >> 15960992

Health priorities and public preferences: the relative importance of past health experience and future health prospects.

Paul Dolan1, Aki Tsuchiya.   

Abstract

We explore people's choices where the preference for those with worse future health prospects and the preference for the young over the old conflict. The empirical study used scenarios with four attributes: past years, past health, future years without treatment, and future health without treatment. One hundred respondents ranked various patient groups described in these terms. The results suggest a strong effect of past years: younger groups (40-year-olds) were always chosen over older ones (60-year-olds). Past health was significant in one question but not the other and future health and years without treatment were both non-significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15960992     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  14 in total

1.  Severity as an independent determinant of the social value of a health service.

Authors:  Jeff R J Richardson; John McKie; Stuart J Peacock; Angelo Iezzi
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-05-09

Review 2.  Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Deborah Marshall; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The cost-effectiveness of cash versus lottery incentives for a web-based, stated-preference community survey.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gajic; David Cameron; Jeremiah Hurley
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-21

4.  Transforming EQ-5D utilities for use in cost–value analysis of health programs.

Authors:  Erik Nord; Rune Johansen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04

5.  Attitudes of Germans towards distributive issues in the German health system.

Authors:  Marlies Ahlert; Christian Pfarr
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-05-27

6.  One and done? Equality of opportunity and repeated access to scarce, indivisible medical resources.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Rob Baltussen; Louis Niessen
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-08-21

8.  Exploring Outcomes to Consider in Economic Evaluations of Health Promotion Programs: What Broader Non-Health Outcomes Matter Most?

Authors:  Tim M Benning; Adrienne F G Alayli-Goebbels; Marie-Jeanne Aarts; Elly Stolk; G Ardine de Wit; Rilana Prenger; Louise M A Braakman-Jansen; Silvia M A A Evers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Does moral reasoning influence public values for health care priority setting?: A population-based randomized stated preference survey.

Authors:  Avram E Denburg; Wendy J Ungar; Shiyi Chen; Jeremiah Hurley; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Valuing QALYs in Relation to Equity Considerations Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Liesbet van de Wetering; Job van Exel; Ana Bobinac; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.