Literature DB >> 15960915

Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members.

Johnny T C Lau1, Nizar M Mahomed, Lew C Schon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With technological advances in ankle arthroplasty, there has been parallel development in the outcome instruments used to assess the results of surgery. The literature recommends the use of valid, reliable, and responsive ankle scores, but the ankle scores commonly used in clinical practice remain undefined.
METHODS: An internet survey of members of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) was conducted to determine which three ankle scores they perceived as most commonly used in the literature, which ones they believe are validated, which ones they prefer, and which they use in practice.
RESULTS: According to respondents, the three most commonly used scores were the AOFAS Ankle score, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS). The respondents believed that the AOFAS Ankle score, FFI, and MODEMS were validated. The FFI and MODEMS are validated, but the AOFAS ankle score is not validated.
CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents preferred using the AOFAS Ankle score. The use of the empirical AOFAS Ankle score continues among AOFAS members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15960915     DOI: 10.1177/107110070502600609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

1.  Medial impingement after ankle replacement.

Authors:  Harish V Kurup; Graeme R Taylor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Severity of injury predicts subsequent function in surgically treated displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures.

Authors:  Stefan Rammelt; Hans Zwipp; Wolfgang Schneiders; Constanze Dürr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS).

Authors:  Maria Cöster; Magnus K Karlsson; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Ake Carlsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in forefoot, hindfoot, and ankle disorders.

Authors:  Maria C Cöster; Ann Bremander; Björn E Rosengren; Håkan Magnusson; Ake Carlsson; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.

Authors:  Tae-Sung In; Jin-Hwa Jung; Keunjo Kim; Kyoung-Sim Jung; Hwi-Young Cho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-01-30

6.  TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE FOOT FUNCTION INDEX - REVISED (FFI-R).

Authors:  Kelly Cristina Stéfani; Miguel Viana Pereira; Pedro Rizzi Oliveira; Paloma Yan Lam Wun
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.

Authors:  Elly Budiman-Mak; Kendon J Conrad; Jessica Mazza; Rodney M Stuck
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.303

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.