Literature DB >> 15960404

Comparison of oxygen cost of breathing between pressure-support ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation.

M Uyar1, K Demirag, E Olgun, I Cankayali, A R Moral.   

Abstract

We compared the oxygen cost of breathing between pressure-support ventilation (PSV) and airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). This prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted in a mixed ICU of a university hospital. Twenty clinically stable and spontaneously breathing patients after long-term mechanical ventilation were included. The patients were randomized to start on either PSV or APRV mode and measurements were obtained after an adaptation period of 30 minutes with a PaCO2 between 35-45 mmHg and PaO2 above 60 mmHg. Patients were then switched to the other mode and the same measurements were repeated. Indirect calorimetry was performed during each ventilatory mode for a period of 30 minutes. Oxygen consumption, energy expenditure, CO2 production, and respiratory quotient were measured. The parameters did not differ significantly between the two ventilatory modes, regardless of the patient's randomization. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to respiratory rate, minute volume, and blood gas analysis. All patients tolerated both ventilatory modes without signs of discomfort. PSV and APRV produced similar results in terms of oxygen cost of breathing and other metabolic variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15960404     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0503300210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  3 in total

Review 1.  Airway pressure release ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure: a systematic review of definitional criteria.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Martyn Hawkins
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Partial ventilatory support modalities in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome-a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah M McMullen; Maureen Meade; Louise Rose; Karen Burns; Sangeeta Mehta; Robert Doyle; Dietrich Henzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of Energy Expenditure and Oxygen Consumption of Spontaneous Breathing Trial Conducted With and Without Automatic Tube Compensation.

Authors:  Alessandra Fabiane Lago; Elaine Cristina Goncalves; Elaine Caetano Silva; Mayra Goncalves Menegueti; Edson Antonio Nicolini; Maria Auxiliadora-Martins; Edson Zangiacomi Martinez; Ada Clarice Gastaldi; Anibal Basile-Filho
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-07-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.