PURPOSE: The reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) volume and mass measurements based on subjective slice-by-slice tracing of LV borders is affected by image quality, and volume estimates are biased by geometric modeling. The authors developed a technique for volumetric surface detection (VoSD) and quantification of LV volumes and mass without tracing and geometric approximations. The authors hypothesized that this technique is accurate and more reproducible than the conventional methodology. METHODS: Images were obtained in 24 patients in 6 to 10 slices from LV base to apex (GE 1.5 T, FIESTA). Volumetric data were reconstructed, and endocardial and epicardial surfaces were detected using the level set approach. LV volumes were obtained from voxel counts and used to compute ejection fraction (EF) and mass. Conventional measurements (MASS Analysis) were used as a reference to test the accuracy of VoSD technique (linear regression, Bland-Altman). For both techniques, measurements were repeated to compute inter- and intra-observer variability. RESULTS: VoSD values resulted in high correlation with the reference values (EDV: r = 0.98; ESV: r = 0.99; EF: r = 0.91; mass: r = 0.98), with no significant biases (8 ml, 5 ml, 0.2% and -9 g) and narrow limits of agreement (SD: 13 ml, 10 ml, 6% and 9 g). Inter-observer variability of the VoSD technique was lower (range 3 to 5%) than that of the reference technique (5 to 11%; p < 0.05). Intra-observer variability was also lower (1 to 3% vs. 7 to 10%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: VoSD technique allows accurate measurements of LV volumes, EF, and mass, which are more reproducible than the conventional methodology.
PURPOSE: The reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) volume and mass measurements based on subjective slice-by-slice tracing of LV borders is affected by image quality, and volume estimates are biased by geometric modeling. The authors developed a technique for volumetric surface detection (VoSD) and quantification of LV volumes and mass without tracing and geometric approximations. The authors hypothesized that this technique is accurate and more reproducible than the conventional methodology. METHODS: Images were obtained in 24 patients in 6 to 10 slices from LV base to apex (GE 1.5 T, FIESTA). Volumetric data were reconstructed, and endocardial and epicardial surfaces were detected using the level set approach. LV volumes were obtained from voxel counts and used to compute ejection fraction (EF) and mass. Conventional measurements (MASS Analysis) were used as a reference to test the accuracy of VoSD technique (linear regression, Bland-Altman). For both techniques, measurements were repeated to compute inter- and intra-observer variability. RESULTS: VoSD values resulted in high correlation with the reference values (EDV: r = 0.98; ESV: r = 0.99; EF: r = 0.91; mass: r = 0.98), with no significant biases (8 ml, 5 ml, 0.2% and -9 g) and narrow limits of agreement (SD: 13 ml, 10 ml, 6% and 9 g). Inter-observer variability of the VoSD technique was lower (range 3 to 5%) than that of the reference technique (5 to 11%; p < 0.05). Intra-observer variability was also lower (1 to 3% vs. 7 to 10%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: VoSD technique allows accurate measurements of LV volumes, EF, and mass, which are more reproducible than the conventional methodology.
Authors: Hans Jaochim Nesser; Lissa Sugeng; Cristiana Corsi; Lynn Weinert; Johannes Niel; Christian Ebner; Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer; Frank Schmidt; Georg Schummers; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi Journal: Heart Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Saskia E Luijnenburg; Daniëlle Robbers-Visser; Adriaan Moelker; Hubert W Vliegen; Barbara J M Mulder; Willem A Helbing Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 2.357