Literature DB >> 15958224

Effect of dynamic loading on the frictional response of bovine articular cartilage.

Ramaswamy Krishnan1, Elise N Mariner, Gerard A Ateshian.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the hypotheses that (1) the steady-state friction coefficient of articular cartilage is significantly smaller under cyclical compressive loading than the equilibrium friction coefficient under static loading, and decreases as a function of loading frequency; (2) the steady-state cartilage interstitial fluid load support remains significantly greater than zero under cyclical compressive loading and increases as a function of loading frequency. Unconfined compression tests with sliding of bovine shoulder cartilage against glass in saline were carried out on fresh cylindrical plugs (n=12), under three sinusoidal loading frequencies (0.05, 0.5 and 1 Hz) and under static loading; the time-dependent friction coefficient mu(eff) was measured. The interstitial fluid load support was also predicted theoretically. Under static loading mu(eff) increased from a minimum value (mu(min)=0.005+/-0.003) to an equilibrium value (mu(eq)=0.153+/-0.032). In cyclical compressive loading tests mu(eff) similarly rose from a minimum value (mu(min)=0.004+/-0.002, 0.003+/-0.001 and 0.003+/-0.001 at 0.05, 0.5 and 1 Hz) and reached a steady-state response oscillating between a lower-bound (mu(lb)=0.092+/-0.016, 0.083+/-0.019 and 0.084+/-0.020) and upper bound (mu(ub)=0.382+/-0.057, 0.358+/-0.059, and 0.298+/-0.061). For all frequencies it was found that mu(ub)>mu(eq) and mu(lb)<mu(eq)(p<0.05). Under cyclical compressive loading the interstitial fluid load support was found to oscillate above and below the static loading response, with suction occurring over a portion of the loading cycle at steady-state conditions. All theoretical predictions and most experimental results demonstrated little sensitivity to loading frequency. On the basis of these results, both hypotheses were rejected. Cyclical compressive loading is not found to promote lower frictional coefficients or higher interstitial fluid load support than static loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15958224      PMCID: PMC4059373          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  22 in total

1.  The lubrication of animal joints in relation to surgical reconstruction by arthroplasty.

Authors:  J CHARNLEY
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1960-03       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Sponge-hydrostatic and weeping bearings.

Authors:  C W McCutchen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1959-10-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Lubrication of animal joints. 3. The effect of certain chemical alterations of the cartilage and lubricant.

Authors:  F C Linn; E L Radin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1968-10

4.  An analysis of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage.

Authors:  C G Armstrong; W M Lai; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments.

Authors:  V C Mow; S C Kuei; W M Lai; C G Armstrong
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  A Conewise Linear Elasticity mixture model for the analysis of tension-compression nonlinearity in articular cartilage.

Authors:  M A Soltz; G A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Interstitial fluid pressurization during confined compression cyclical loading of articular cartilage.

Authors:  M A Soltz; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Cartilage stresses in the human hip joint.

Authors:  T Macirowski; S Tepic; R W Mann
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Cartilage interstitial fluid load support in unconfined compression.

Authors:  Seonghun Park; Ramaswamy Krishnan; Steven B Nicoll; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Inhomogeneous cartilage properties enhance superficial interstitial fluid support and frictional properties, but do not provide a homogeneous state of stress.

Authors:  Ramaswamy Krishnan; Seonghun Park; Felix Eckstein; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale mechanics of articular cartilage: potentials and challenges of coupling musculoskeletal, joint, and microscale computational models.

Authors:  J P Halloran; S Sibole; C C van Donkelaar; M C van Turnhout; C W J Oomens; J A Weiss; F Guilak; A Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  [Tribological assessment of articular cartilage. A system for the analysis of the friction coefficient of cartilage, regenerates and tissue engineering constructs; initial results].

Authors:  M L R Schwarz; B Schneider-Wald; A Krase; W Richter; G Reisig; M Kreinest; S Heute; P P Pott; J Brade; A Schütte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Advanced material strategies for tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Lisa E Freed; George C Engelmayr; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Franklin T Moutos; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Multifunctional hybrid three-dimensionally woven scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Franklin T Moutos; Bradley T Estes; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.979

5.  Dynamic compression augments interstitial transport of a glucose-like solute in articular cartilage.

Authors:  Robin C Evans; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The temporal response of the friction coefficient of articular cartilage depends on the contact area.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Ines M Basalo; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Comparison of two methods for calculating the frictional properties of articular cartilage using a simple pendulum and intact mouse knee joints.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Drewniak; Gregory D Jay; Braden C Fleming; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Effects of sustained interstitial fluid pressurization under migrating contact area, and boundary lubrication by synovial fluid, on cartilage friction.

Authors:  M Caligaris; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Investigation of the frictional response of osteoarthritic human tibiofemoral joints and the potential beneficial tribological effect of healthy synovial fluid.

Authors:  M Caligaris; C E Canal; C S Ahmad; T R Gardner; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 10.  The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.