Literature DB >> 15958205

The influence of product and oral characteristics on swallowing.

Lina Engelen1, Anneke Fontijn-Tekamp, Andries van der Bilt.   

Abstract

The urge to swallow food could be triggered by a threshold level in both food particle size and lubrication of the food bolus. Thus, both oral physiology and product characteristics may influence the swallowing threshold. We quantified the swallowing threshold in a group of 266 healthy adult subjects (age 42 +/- 12 years) by counting the number of chewing cycles needed to prepare food for swallowing. The influence of oral physiology on the swallowing threshold was determined by measuring salivary flow rate, maximum bite force and masticatory performance. We used about 10 cm(3) of bread, toast, melba toast, breakfast cake, peanuts and cheese to determine the influence on the swallowing threshold of various food characteristics, e.g. hardness, moisture and fat. Furthermore, we tested the effect of buttering the bread, toast, melba toast and breakfast cake on the swallowing threshold. Salivary flow rates were significantly and negatively correlated with the number of chewing cycles of melba toast and breakfast cake. Hence, subjects with more saliva needed less chewing cycles for these dry products. Maximum bite force and masticatory performance had an influence on the swallowing threshold for the hard products only (carrot and peanut). Although significant, the correlation coefficients were less than 0.28. Thus, the oral physiology parameters explained less than 10% of the variance in the swallowing threshold. We found significantly different numbers of chewing cycles for the various foods, ranging from 17 for cake to 63 for carrot. Hard and dry products needed more chewing cycles until swallowing. Buttering the food significantly reduced the number of chewing cycles needed before swallowing. This was especially true for the dry products cake, melba toast and toast. Hard and dry products require more chewing cycles and longer time in mouth until swallowing for sufficient breakdown to take place and for enough saliva to be added to form a coherent bolus safe for swallowing. In spite of this, more saliva, higher maximum bite force and better masticatory performance were only weakly correlated with a smaller number of chewing cycles. Butter enhanced lubrication and bolus formation of dry products, thus reducing the number of chewing cycles until swallowing. In conclusion, product characteristics and to a lesser extent oral physiology significantly affect swallowing threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15958205     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  20 in total

Review 1.  Impact of oral processing on texture attributes and taste perception.

Authors:  Dengyong Liu; Yajun Deng; Lei Sha; Md Abul Hashem; Shengmei Gai
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Frequency of stage II oral transport cycles in healthy human.

Authors:  Haruhi Inokuchi; Martin B Brodsky; Marlís González-Fernández; Mitsumasa Yoda; Takashi Hiraoka; Koichiro Matsuo; Jeffrey B Palmer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Increased oral processing and a slower eating rate increase glycaemic, insulin and satiety responses to a mixed meal tolerance test.

Authors:  Ai Ting Goh; Jie Ying Michelle Choy; Xin Hui Chua; Shalini Ponnalagu; Chin Meng Khoo; Clare Whitton; Rob Martinus van Dam; Ciarán Gerard Forde
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  The influence of thickeners of food on the particle size of boluses: a consideration for swallowing.

Authors:  Erika Yamaguchi; Tetsurou Torisu; Hiroaki Tada; Yuichi Tanabe; Tadafumi Kurogi; Shinya Mikushi; Hiroshi Murata
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Food transit duration is associated with the number of stage II transport cycles when eating solid food.

Authors:  Takashi Hiraoka; Jeffrey B Palmer; Martin B Brodsky; Mitsumasa Yoda; Haruhi Inokuchi; Akio Tsubahara
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  Phylogenetic rate shifts in feeding time during the evolution of Homo.

Authors:  Chris Organ; Charles L Nunn; Zarin Machanda; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Influence of oral processing behaviour and bolus properties of brown rice and chickpeas on in vitro starch digestion and postprandial glycaemic response.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Markus Stieger; Edoardo Capuano; Ciarán G Forde; Sandra van der Haar; Meeke Ummels; Heleen van den Bosch; Rene de Wijk
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Effects of Peanut Processing on Masticatory Performance during Variable Appetitive States.

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2009-11-19

Review 9.  Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment.

Authors:  Thais Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves; Martin Schimmel; Andries van der Bilt; Jianshe Chen; Hilbert W van der Glas; Kaoru Kohyama; Martine Hennequin; Marie-Agnès Peyron; Alain Woda; Claudio Rodrigues Leles; Luciano José Pereira
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Role of physical bolus properties as sensory inputs in the trigger of swallowing.

Authors:  Marie-Agnès Peyron; Isabelle Gierczynski; Christoph Hartmann; Chrystel Loret; Dominique Dardevet; Nathalie Martin; Alain Woda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.