Literature DB >> 15956789

Comparative study of tolerance between unmodified and high doses of chemically modified allergen vaccines of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.

Miguel Casanovas1, Enrique Fernández-Caldas, Remedios Alamar, Antonio Basomba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The physiochemical modification of allergens to reduce allergenicity, while retaining immunogenicity, provides a chance for the administration of higher doses of immunotherapy, with a decreased risk of systemic reactions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of doses of depigmented glutaraldehyde-polymerized vaccine of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus increasing those used in normal clinical conditions in comparison with regular doses of a non-modified vaccine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was double-blind, parallel and included two patient groups. Twenty-three patients were treated weekly during 9 visits for the build-up phase, followed by 2-weekly maintenance doses (a total of 11 injections per patient). Eleven patients (mean age 22 years) received immunotherapy with the standardized modified vaccine. The maximum dose used was the result of depigmenting and polymerizing 100 times the maximum dose used with the native extract. The maximum concentration used was 990 mug/ml of freeze-dried material. Twelve patients (mean age 24 years) received a standardized, unmodified allergenic extract. The maximum concentration used was 70 mug of freeze-dried material/ml, with a potency of 10 HEP(L)/ml. The tolerance was evaluated recording all the side reactions related to immunotherapy and graded following the recommendations of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology.
RESULTS: In both groups, all immediate local reactions were clinically not relevant. Patients treated with the native extract experienced 42 local immediate and 24 delayed reactions (1 of them had a diameter >10 cm), whereas patients treated with the modified extract experienced 30 local immediate and 21 delayed reactions (2 of them had a diameter >10 cm). Four systemic reactions in 2 patients, 1 immediate of grade 1 and 3 delayed of grade 2 were reported in the group treated with native extract and 1 delayed of grade 2 in the group treated with the modified preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified extract of D. pteronyssinus, used at concentrations which are 10 times higher than those regularly administered in clinical practice, demonstrated to be safe to treat D. pteronyssinus-sensitive patients. The majority of the local reactions (immediate and delayed) were clinically not relevant (diameter <5 cm). No systemic reactions of grade 3 or 4 were noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15956789     DOI: 10.1159/000086333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1018-2438            Impact factor:   2.749


  12 in total

Review 1.  Mite immunotherapy.

Authors:  Enrique Fernández-Caldas; Victor Iraola; Manuel Boquete; Antonio Nieto; Miguel Casanovas
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Reduced in vitro T-cell responses induced by glutaraldehyde-modified allergen extracts are caused mainly by retarded internalization of dendritic cells.

Authors:  Bärbel Heydenreich; Iris Bellinghausen; Steffen Lorenz; Helene Henmar; Dennis Strand; Peter A Würtzen; Joachim Saloga
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Tolerance and immunological changes of chemically modified allergen vaccine of Parietaria judaica in accelerated schedules.

Authors:  J A Asturias; A Ferrer; M C Arilla; C Andreu; B Madariaga; A Martínez
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Adjuvant effects of aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed allergens and allergoids - differences in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  B Heydenreich; I Bellinghausen; L Lund; H Henmar; G Lund; P Adler Würtzen; J Saloga
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Allergenicity, immunogenicity and dose-relationship of three intact allergen vaccines and four allergoid vaccines for subcutaneous grass pollen immunotherapy.

Authors:  H Henmar; G Lund; L Lund; A Petersen; P A Würtzen
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A novel and well tolerated mite allergoid subcutaneous immunotherapy: evidence of clinical and immunologic efficacy.

Authors:  Albert Roger; Nathalie Depreux; Yani Jurgens; Matthew D Heath; Gloria Garcia; Murray A Skinner
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2014-05-29

Review 7.  Nanomaterials in the Context of Type 2 Immune Responses-Fears and Potentials.

Authors:  Martin Himly; Robert Mills-Goodlet; Mark Geppert; Albert Duschl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  House dust mite-specific immunotherapy with two licensed vaccines: Outcome under clinical routine conditions.

Authors:  Vera Mahler; Christian Klein; Angelika Sager; Jürgen Zimmermann
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2017-03-05

9.  Clinical and immunological changes of immunotherapy in patients with atopic dermatitis: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jorge Mario Sánchez Caraballo; Ricardo Cardona Villa
Journal:  ISRN Allergy       Date:  2012-03-07

10.  Ultrarush schedule of subcutaneous immunotherapy with modified allergen extracts is safe in paediatric age.

Authors:  Mário Morais-Almeida; Cristina Arêde; Graça Sampaio; Luis Miguel Borrego
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2016-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.