BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The main clinical indication for functional MR imaging (fMRI) has been to preoperatively map the cortex. Motor paradigms to activate the cortex are simple and robust; however, language tasks show greater variability and difficulty. The aim of this study was to develop a language task with an adequate control task to engage the areas of the posterior temporal lobe responsible for sentence comprehension. METHODS: We performed a cloze paradigm requiring silent reading of a visually presented sentence-completion task based on semantic meaning versus a letter-scanning epoch requiring the completion of nonlinguistic strings or a rest period. Before this task was clinically used in two patients epilepsy and cavernous angioma, its feasibility and accuracy were tested in 14 healthy right-handed participants. RESULTS: Results showed significant activation of the posterior temporal cortex, including a broad area across the posterior left temporal cortex extending into the inferior parietal lobule. When the sentence completion-minus-letter string task was compared with the sentence completion-minus-rest task, increased activation was present in the posterior temporal lobe. CONCLUSION: Decreased significant activation during the sentence completion-minus-rest contrast may be attributed to increased noise from intersubject variability in the rest period. Our results suggest that this task elucidates areas important to reading comprehension in the posterior and inferior temporal regions that verbal fluency and auditory discrimination tasks do not. Data from two cases are summarized to exemplify the input of this task for neurosurgery.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The main clinical indication for functional MR imaging (fMRI) has been to preoperatively map the cortex. Motor paradigms to activate the cortex are simple and robust; however, language tasks show greater variability and difficulty. The aim of this study was to develop a language task with an adequate control task to engage the areas of the posterior temporal lobe responsible for sentence comprehension. METHODS: We performed a cloze paradigm requiring silent reading of a visually presented sentence-completion task based on semantic meaning versus a letter-scanning epoch requiring the completion of nonlinguistic strings or a rest period. Before this task was clinically used in two patientsepilepsy and cavernous angioma, its feasibility and accuracy were tested in 14 healthy right-handed participants. RESULTS: Results showed significant activation of the posterior temporal cortex, including a broad area across the posterior left temporal cortex extending into the inferior parietal lobule. When the sentence completion-minus-letter string task was compared with the sentence completion-minus-rest task, increased activation was present in the posterior temporal lobe. CONCLUSION: Decreased significant activation during the sentence completion-minus-rest contrast may be attributed to increased noise from intersubject variability in the rest period. Our results suggest that this task elucidates areas important to reading comprehension in the posterior and inferior temporal regions that verbal fluency and auditory discrimination tasks do not. Data from two cases are summarized to exemplify the input of this task for neurosurgery.
Authors: T T Kircher; E T Bulimore; M J Brammer; S C Williams; M R Broome; R M Murray; P K McGuire Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2001-05-30 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: K Deblaere; W H Backes; P Hofman; P Vandemaele; P A Boon; K Vonck; P Boon; J Troost; J Vermeulen; J Wilmink; E Achten; A Aldenkamp Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: R Todd Constable; Kenneth R Pugh; Ella Berroya; W Einar Mencl; Michael Westerveld; Weijia Ni; Donald Shankweiler Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Manzar Ashtari; Todd Lencz; Paula Zuffante; Robert Bilder; Tana Clarke; Alan Diamond; John Kane; Philip Szeszko Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: J G Ojemann; R L Buckner; E Akbudak; A Z Snyder; J M Ollinger; R C McKinstry; B R Rosen; S E Petersen; M E Raichle; T E Conturo Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 1998 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: L Petit; S Dubois; N Tzourio; S Dejardin; F Crivello; C Michel; O Etard; P Denise; A Roucoux; B Mazoyer Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 1999 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Prashin Unadkat; Luca Fumagalli; Laura Rigolo; Mark G Vangel; Geoffrey S Young; Raymond Huang; Srinivasan Mukundan; Alexandra Golby; Yanmei Tie Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Kamel El Salek; Islam S Hassan; Aikaterini Kotrotsou; Srishti Abrol; Scott H Faro; Feroze B Mohamed; Pascal O Zinn; Wei Wei; Nan Li; Ashok J Kumar; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Jeffrey S Wefel; Shelli R Kesler; Ho-Ling Anthony Liu; Ping Hou; R Jason Stafford; Sujit Prabhu; Raymond Sawaya; Rivka R Colen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 4.379