Literature DB >> 15956456

Biological responses to porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus in pigs of two genetic populations.

D B Petry1, J W Holl, J S Weber, A R Doster, F A Osorio, R K Johnson.   

Abstract

One hundred pigs from the NE Index Line (NEI) and 100 Hampshire-Duroc cross pigs (HD) were inoculated intranasally with porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus (PRRSV 97-7895 strain) at 26 d of age to determine whether genetic variation in response to PRRSV exists. An uninfected littermate to each infected pig served as a control. Pigs were from 163 dams and 83 sires. Body weight and rectal temperature were recorded, and blood samples were drawn from each pig on d 0 before inoculation and on d 4, 7, and 14 after inoculation. Pigs were sacrificed on d 14. Lung and bronchial lymph nodes were collected, placed in optimal cutting temperature compound, and frozen at -80 degrees C. The presence of PRRSV in serum and in lung tissue and bronchial lymph nodes was determined by isolation in cell culture. The presence of antibodies in serum collected on d 14 was determined by a commercial ELISA test. Lung tissue was examined microscopically and scored for incidence and severity of lesions (score of 1 to 3; 1 = no or few lesions, and 3 = severe interstitial pneumonia). Data were analyzed with a mixed model that included random sire and dam effects. The interaction of line x treatment was significant (P < 0.001) for weight change and rectal temperature. Un-infected HD pigs gained 0.67 kg more from d 0 to 14 and averaged 0.32 degrees C higher rectal temperature than uninfected NEI pigs (P < 0.001), whereas infected NEI pigs gained 0.34 kg more and had -0.54 degrees C lower temperature than infected HD pigs (P < 0.001). Viremic titer (cell culture infectious dose 50%/mL) was greater (P < 0.05) in HD than NEI at d 4 (10(4.52) vs. 10(4.22)), 7 (10(4.47) vs. 10(3.99)), and 14 (10(3.49) vs. 10(3.23)). Viral titer loads in lung (P = 0.11) and bronchial lymph nodes tended (P = 0.07) to be greater in HD than NEI pigs. Antibody signal-to-positive (S/P) ELISA ratios in infected pigs ranged from 0.18 to 3.38, and 88% had levels > or = 0.40, which is the positive threshold for this ELISA. The S/P range in uninfected pigs was 0 to 1.11, and 99% had levels < or = 0.40. Mean S/P ratio for infected pigs was 0.23 units higher in HD than in NEI (P < 0.001). The HD pigs had a greater incidence of interstitial pneumonia and 0.65 higher mean lesion scores than NEI pigs (P < 0.001). In summary, responses of pigs of the two lines to infection with PRRSV differed, indicating that underlying genetic variation existed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15956456     DOI: 10.2527/2005.8371494x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of pathogenicity of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between wild and domestic pigs.

Authors:  T D Do; C Park; K Choi; J Jeong; M K Vo; T T Nguyen; C Chae
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Host inhibits replication of European porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in macrophages by altering differential regulation of type-I interferon transcriptional response.

Authors:  Tahar Ait-Ali; Alison D Wilson; Wilfrid Carré; David G Westcott; Jean-Pierre Frossard; Marnie A Mellencamp; Daphne Mouzaki; Oswald Matika; David Waddington; Trevor W Drew; Stephen C Bishop; Alan L Archibald
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.846

3.  Whole-Genome Sequencing of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus from Field Clinical Samples Improves the Genomic Surveillance of the Virus.

Authors:  Christian Lalonde; Chantale Provost; Carl A Gagnon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Using SNP array data to test for host genetic and breed effects on Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Viremia.

Authors:  Stefano Biffani; Sara Botti; Stephen C Bishop; Alessandra Stella; Elisabetta Giuffra
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-06-03

5.  Probing genetic control of swine responses to PRRSV infection: current progress of the PRRS host genetics consortium.

Authors:  Joan K Lunney; Juan Pedro Steibel; James M Reecy; Eric Fritz; Max F Rothschild; Maureen Kerrigan; B Trible; Raymond Rr Rowland
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-06-03

Review 6.  Advances in swine biomedical model genomics.

Authors:  Joan K Lunney
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 6.580

7.  A novel Respiratory Health Score (RHS) supports a role of acute lung damage and pig breed in the course of an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infection.

Authors:  Doris Hoeltig; Isabel Hennig-Pauka; Kerstin Thies; Thomas Rehm; Martin Beyerbach; Katrin Strutzberg-Minder; Gerald F Gerlach; Karl-Heinz Waldmann
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Characterizing differential individual response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection through statistical and functional analysis of gene expression.

Authors:  Maria E Arceo; Catherine W Ernst; Joan K Lunney; Igseo Choi; Nancy E Raney; Tinghua Huang; Christopher K Tuggle; R R R Rowland; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) through genetic improvements in disease resistance and tolerance.

Authors:  Raymond R R Rowland; Joan Lunney; Jack Dekkers
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Genome-wide gene expression profiles in lung tissues of pig breeds differing in resistance to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Jinyi Xing; Feng Xing; Chenhua Zhang; Yujie Zhang; Nan Wang; Yanping Li; Lijuan Yang; Chenglan Jiang; Chaoyang Zhang; Changhong Wen; Yunliang Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.