Literature DB >> 15956455

Evaluation of approaches to detect quantitative trait loci for growth, carcass, and meat quality on swine chromosomes 2, 6, 13, and 18. I. Univariate outbred F2 and sib-pair analyses.

T M Stearns1, J E Beever, B R Southey, M Ellis, F K McKeith, S L Rodriguez-Zas.   

Abstract

Results from univariate outbred F2 interval mapping and sib-pair analyses of 12 growth and 28 carcass traits to identify QTL on SSC 2, 6, 13, and 18 were compared. Phenotypic and genetic data were recorded on a three-generation resource population including 832 F2 pigs from a cross between three Berkshire sires and 18 Duroc dams. Thirty markers with an average spacing of approximately 16 cM were genotyped across the four chromosomes. The outbred F2 mixed model included the effects of sex, birth month, and year, one-QTL additive, dominance and imprinting coefficients calculated every 1 cM using interval mapping, and a random family effect. The general sib-pair model used to describe the phenotypic differences between sib-pairs included the same systematic and random effects and a one-QTL additive coefficient calculated every 1 cM. The outbred F2 analysis found significant evidence of QTL on SSC 2 associated with 105-d weight, backfat thicknesses, LM area, fat percent, shear force, juiciness, marbling, and tenderness. In addition, QTL were identified on SSC 6 relating to 42-d weight and LM area, and on SSC 18 for fat and moisture percents. In most instances, the outbred F2 approach offered greater power to detect QTL; however, the sib-pair analysis offered greater power in several instances. The trait-specific superiority could be due to the relative advantage of each model within a trait data set. The two approaches provided complementary evidence for QTL segregating between the Berkshire and Duroc breeds used in the study that may be used to aid marker-assisted introgression and selection and candidate gene studies to improve swine growth and meat quality characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15956455     DOI: 10.2527/2005.8371481x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Porcine ubiquitin-like 5 (UBL5) gene: genomic organization, polymorphisms, mRNA cloning, splicing variants and association study.

Authors:  Martin Masopust; Filip Weisz; Heinz Bartenschlager; Aleš Knoll; Zuzana Vykoukalová; Hermann Geldermann; Stanislav Cepica
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Genetic linkage mapping and analysis of muscle fiber-related QTLs in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.).

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Peng Xu; Cuiyun Lu; Youyi Kuang; Xiaofeng Zhang; Dingchen Cao; Chao Li; Yumei Chang; Ning Hou; Hengde Li; Shu Wang; Xiaowen Sun
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Evaluation of the effect and profitability of gene-assisted selection in pig breeding system.

Authors:  Ya-Lan Li; Qin Zhang; Yao-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Genotype imputation accuracy in a F2 pig population using high density and low density SNP panels.

Authors:  Jose L Gualdrón Duarte; Ronald O Bates; Catherine W Ernst; Nancy E Raney; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  The imprinted gene DIO3 is a candidate gene for litter size in pigs.

Authors:  Albart Coster; Ole Madsen; Henri C M Heuven; Bert Dibbits; Martien A M Groenen; Johan A M van Arendonk; Henk Bovenhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Whole Genome Association Study on Meat Quality Traits Using High Density SNP Chips in a Cross between Korean Native Pig and Landrace.

Authors:  K-T Lee; Y-M Lee; M Alam; B H Choi; M R Park; K-S Kim; T-H Kim; J-J Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Identification of QTL with effects on intramuscular fat content and fatty acid composition in a Duroc x Large White cross.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Sanchez; Nathalie Iannuccelli; Benjamin Basso; Jean-Pierre Bidanel; Yvon Billon; Gilles Gandemer; Hélène Gilbert; Catherine Larzul; Christian Legault; Juliette Riquet; Denis Milan; Pascale Le Roy
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Fine-mapping of a QTL influencing pork tenderness on porcine chromosome 2.

Authors:  Stacey N Meyers; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas; Jonathan E Beever
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 2.797

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.