Literature DB >> 15955280

Discrepancies between the isolation of Salmonella from mesenteric lymph nodes and the results of serological screening in slaughter pigs.

Nathalie Nollet1, Dominiek Maes, Luc Duchateau, Veerle Hautekiet, Kurt Houf, Jan Van Hoof, Lieven De Zuttera, Aart De Kruif, Rony Geers.   

Abstract

Most Salmonella control programmes are based on serological testing in the slaughterhouse. However, from a point of view of carcass contamination, it is rather the presence of Salmonella spp. in the animal at the time of slaughter that is important. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the possible discrepancies between the isolation of Salmonella spp. in the mesenteric lymph nodes and the results of serological screening. In total, 1821 fattening pigs originating from 60 Belgian farrow-to-finish herds were sampled in the slaughterhouse. The serum samples were analysed using an indirect mix-ELISA for the presence of Salmonella antibodies and evaluated at 3 cut-off values namely 10, 20, and 40% Optical Density (OD). All mesenteric lymph node samples were submitted to qualitative Salmonella isolation and a representative number of isolates was serotyped. From each herd, 30 animals were screened both serologically and bacteriologically and the herd was considered as positive when at least one sample was positive. At the herd level, 83.6% (cut-off OD 40%) to 100.0% (cut-off OD 10%) of the herds from which Salmonella had been isolated were evaluated as seropositive. At the individual level, only 34.5% (cut-off OD 40%) to 82.8% (cut-off OD 10%) of the animals from which Salmonella had been isolated were seropositive. Overall, a weak agreement was found between bacteriology and serology for Salmonella diagnosis. If pig herds are categorised using serological tests in the slaughterhouse, one should be aware of the fact that slaughter pigs can still harbour Salmonella spp. in the mesenteric lymph nodes, without being detected in serological tests. The cut-off value used to evaluate a sample as serologically positive and the number of samples per herd are of major importance to classify herds correctly in order to protect human health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15955280     DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2005014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  9 in total

Review 1.  Modernization of Control of Pathogenic Micro-Organisms in the Food-Chain Requires a Durable Role for Immunoaffinity-Based Detection Methodology-A Review.

Authors:  Aldert A Bergwerff; Sylvia B Debast
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-11

2.  Attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium lacking the ZnuABC transporter: an efficacious orally-administered mucosal vaccine against salmonellosis in pigs.

Authors:  Matteo Gradassi; Michele Pesciaroli; Nicola Martinelli; Jessica Ruggeri; Paola Petrucci; Walid Hamdy Hassan; Manuela Raffatellu; Frine Eleonora Scaglione; Serena Ammendola; Andrea Battistoni; Giovanni L Alborali; Paolo Pasquali
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Salmonella enterica subclinical infection: bacteriological, serological, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antimicrobial resistance profiles--longitudinal study in a three-site farrow-to-finish farm.

Authors:  German B Vigo; Javier A Cappuccio; Pablo E Piñeyro; Angela Salve; Mariana A Machuca; Maria A Quiroga; Fabiana Moredo; Gabriel Giacoboni; Jose L Cancer; Ines G Caffer; Norma Binsztein; Mariana Pichel; Carlos J Perfumo
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.171

4.  Salmonella Mesenteric Lymphadenitis Causing Septic Peritonitis in Two Dogs.

Authors:  Erin M Binagia; Nyssa A Levy
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2020-02-27

5.  Salmonella identified in pigs in Kenya and Malawi reveals the potential for zoonotic transmission in emerging pork markets.

Authors:  Catherine N Wilson; Caisey V Pulford; James Akoko; Blanca Perez Sepulveda; Alexander V Predeus; Jessica Bevington; Patricia Duncan; Neil Hall; Paul Wigley; Nicholas Feasey; Gina Pinchbeck; Jay C D Hinton; Melita A Gordon; Eric M Fèvre
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-11-24

6.  Salmonella Infection in Nursery Piglets and Its Role in the Spread of Salmonellosis to Further Production Periods.

Authors:  María Bernad-Roche; Alejandro Casanova-Higes; Clara M Marín-Alcalá; Alberto Cebollada-Solanas; Raúl C Mainar-Jaime
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Transmission parameters estimated for Salmonella typhimurium in swine using susceptible-infectious-resistant models and a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Carla Correia-Gomes; Theodoros Economou; Trevor Bailey; Pavel Brazdil; Lis Alban; João Niza-Ribeiro
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  The commercial impact of pig Salmonella spp. infections in border-free markets during an economic recession.

Authors:  G Evangelopoulou; S Kritas; G Christodoulopoulos; A R Burriel
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-03-05

9.  Putting the microbiota to work: Epigenetic effects of early life antibiotic treatment are associated with immune-related pathways and reduced epithelial necrosis following Salmonella Typhimurium challenge in vitro.

Authors:  Matheus O Costa; Janelle Fouhse; Ana Paula P Silva; Benjamin Willing; John C S Harding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.