Literature DB >> 15954950

Aftermath of an adverse event: supporting health care professionals to meet patient expectations through open disclosure.

T Manser1, S Staender.   

Abstract

An important element of how adverse events are handled is effective communication between health care providers and patients and their families. This review addresses the main questions: What do patients expect in the aftermath of an adverse event? What is known about the practice of open disclosure? How can organizations support health care providers in the aftermath of an adverse event, both professionally and personally? Patients clearly expect open disclosure to include an explanation of what happened, an apology for harm done, that appropriate remedial action will be taken and an explanation of what will be done to learn from the event and to prevent recurrence. Research has found that open disclosure is not very common although the ethical duty to disclose is widely acknowledged. Barriers to open disclosure include discomfort and a lack of training how to disclose, a fear of litigation, a culture of infallibility among health professionals, and inadequate systems for analysis, discussion and learning from mistakes. Significant commitment is required from health care organizations and managers to develop frameworks for open disclosure to occur, to assure its quality and to support health care providers in this process. Organizations also need to address the emotional needs of health care professionals in the aftermath of an adverse event. Last but not least, adequate systems for debriefing and incident analysis need to be in place to learn from adverse events and to avoid recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15954950     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00746.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  10 in total

1.  Disclosure of Medical Errors in Oman: Public preferences and perceptions of current practice.

Authors:  Mark I K Norrish
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-05-28

2.  Predictors of death anxiety among midwives who have experienced maternal death situations at work.

Authors:  Rhoda Suubi Muliira; Vito Bosco Sendikadiwa; Fred Lwasampijja
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05

3.  [Anaesthetists learn--do institutions also learn? Importance of institutional learning and corporate culture in clinics].

Authors:  G Schüpfer; R Gfrörer; A Schleppers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Patients' Experiences With Communication-and-Resolution Programs After Medical Injury.

Authors:  Jennifer Moore; Marie Bismark; Michelle M Mello
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Patients' and family members' views on how clinicians enact and how they should enact incident disclosure: the "100 patient stories" qualitative study.

Authors:  Rick Iedema; Suellen Allen; Kate Britton; Donella Piper; Andrew Baker; Carol Grbich; Alfred Allan; Liz Jones; Anthony Tuckett; Allison Williams; Elizabeth Manias; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-25

6.  Effect of a simulation-based workshop on breaking bad news for anesthesiology residents: an intervention study.

Authors:  Vanda Yazbeck Karam; Hanane Barakat; Marie Aouad; Ilene Harris; Yoon Soo Park; Nazih Youssef; John Jack Boulet; Ara Tekian
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  The Second Victim Phenomenon After a Clinical Error: The Design and Evaluation of a Website to Reduce Caregivers' Emotional Responses After a Clinical Error.

Authors:  José Joaquín Mira; Irene Carrillo; Mercedes Guilabert; Susana Lorenzo; Pastora Pérez-Pérez; Carmen Silvestre; Lena Ferrús
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  The relationship of moral sensitivity and patient safety attitudes with nursing students' perceptions of disclosure of patient safety incidents: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Eunmi Lee; Yujeong Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A survey of community members' perceptions of medical errors in Oman.

Authors:  Ahmed S Al-Mandhari; Mohammed A Al-Shafaee; Mohammed H Al-Azri; Ibrahim S Al-Zakwani; Mushtaq Khan; Ahmed M Al-Waily; Syed Rizvi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  The struggle against perceived negligence. A qualitative study of patients' experiences of adverse events in Norwegian hospitals.

Authors:  Gunn Hågensen; Gudrun Nilsen; Grete Mehus; Nils Henriksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.