BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the mode of delivery in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix following induction of labor with vaginal application of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) near or at term, and to define the predictors of successful vaginal delivery in such women. METHODS: In a retrospective case-controlled study, pregnant women with hypertension, who underwent labor induction with PGE(2) tablets (study group, n = 284), were compared with women, who underwent elective induction of labor (group 2, n = 115), and women with normal spontaneous onset of labor (group 3, n = 510). RESULTS: The rate of cesarean section (CS) was significantly higher in the study group (25.3%) than in group 2 (14.8%) and in group 3 (9%). Exclusion of the nulliparous women from the study and control groups yielded similar CS rates in the study group (16.9%) and in group 2 (11.1%). Women with pre-eclampsia and the women with chronic hypertension or pregnancy-induced hypertension had similar rates of CS. In logistic regression model, nulliparity, induction of labor with PGE(2), and maternal age, but not hypertensive disorders, were independently and significantly associated with increased risk of CS. CONCLUSIONS: PGE(2) induction of labor is successful in approximately 75% of patients with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix, with apparently no serious maternal or fetal complications. The induction of labor by itself, and not the hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, is independent risk factor for CS.
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the mode of delivery in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix following induction of labor with vaginal application of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) near or at term, and to define the predictors of successful vaginal delivery in such women. METHODS: In a retrospective case-controlled study, pregnant women with hypertension, who underwent labor induction with PGE(2) tablets (study group, n = 284), were compared with women, who underwent elective induction of labor (group 2, n = 115), and women with normal spontaneous onset of labor (group 3, n = 510). RESULTS: The rate of cesarean section (CS) was significantly higher in the study group (25.3%) than in group 2 (14.8%) and in group 3 (9%). Exclusion of the nulliparous women from the study and control groups yielded similar CS rates in the study group (16.9%) and in group 2 (11.1%). Women with pre-eclampsia and the women with chronic hypertension or pregnancy-induced hypertension had similar rates of CS. In logistic regression model, nulliparity, induction of labor with PGE(2), and maternal age, but not hypertensive disorders, were independently and significantly associated with increased risk of CS. CONCLUSIONS:PGE(2) induction of labor is successful in approximately 75% of patients with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix, with apparently no serious maternal or fetal complications. The induction of labor by itself, and not the hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, is independent risk factor for CS.