OBJECTIVES: Estrogen is metabolized in the body through two mutually exclusive pathways yielding metabolites with different biological activities: the low estrogenic 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) and the highly estrogenic 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1). The ratio of these metabolites (2/16) may be predictive of risk for developing breast cancer. Early evidence has demonstrated that exercise may alter estrogen metabolism to favor the weak estrogen, 2-OHE1. METHODS: Seventy-seven eumenorrheic females completed physical activity logs for two weeks prior to providing a luteal phase urine sample. Concentrations of 2-OHE1 and 16alpha-OHE1 were measured and the 2/16 ratio computed. Hierarchical regression, controlling for age and body mass index (BMI), was used to determine relationships between estrogen metabolites and daily physical activity. RESULTS: Regression analyses indicated significant positive relationships between physical activity and 2-OHE1 and the 2/16 ratio (p < 0.05) that appears to be independent of BMI. 16alpha-OHE1 was not significantly related to physical activity. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that physical activity may modulate estrogen metabolism to favor the weak estrogen, 2-OHE1, thus producing a higher 2/16 ratio. This alteration in estrogen metabolism may represent one of the mechanisms by which increased physical activity reduces breast cancer risk.
OBJECTIVES: Estrogen is metabolized in the body through two mutually exclusive pathways yielding metabolites with different biological activities: the low estrogenic 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) and the highly estrogenic 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1). The ratio of these metabolites (2/16) may be predictive of risk for developing breast cancer. Early evidence has demonstrated that exercise may alter estrogen metabolism to favor the weak estrogen, 2-OHE1. METHODS: Seventy-seven eumenorrheic females completed physical activity logs for two weeks prior to providing a luteal phase urine sample. Concentrations of 2-OHE1 and 16alpha-OHE1 were measured and the 2/16 ratio computed. Hierarchical regression, controlling for age and body mass index (BMI), was used to determine relationships between estrogen metabolites and daily physical activity. RESULTS: Regression analyses indicated significant positive relationships between physical activity and 2-OHE1 and the 2/16 ratio (p < 0.05) that appears to be independent of BMI. 16alpha-OHE1 was not significantly related to physical activity. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that physical activity may modulate estrogen metabolism to favor the weak estrogen, 2-OHE1, thus producing a higher 2/16 ratio. This alteration in estrogen metabolism may represent one of the mechanisms by which increased physical activity reduces breast cancer risk.
Authors: Alma J Smith; William R Phipps; William Thomas; Kathryn H Schmitz; Mindy S Kurzer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Renee T Fortner; Xia Xu; Susan E Hankinson; A Heather Eliassen; Regina G Ziegler Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Yasmine Souissi; Said Kinani; Stéphane Bouchonnet; Sophie Bourcier; Christian Malosse; Michel Sablier; Nicolas Creusot; Enrico Mombelli; Selim Aït-Aïssa Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Cher M Dallal; Louise A Brinton; Charles E Matthews; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Terryl J Hartman; Jolanta Lissowska; Roni T Falk; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Xia Xu; Timothy D Veenstra; Gretchen L Gierach Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jing Xie; A Heather Eliassen; Xia Xu; Charles E Matthews; Susan E Hankinson; Regina G Ziegler; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Megan B Irby; Dale S Bond; Richard B Lipton; Barbara Nicklas; Timothy T Houle; Donald B Penzien Journal: Headache Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Agustín Aibar-Almazán; Ana Voltes-Martínez; Yolanda Castellote-Caballero; Diego Fernando Afanador-Restrepo; María Del Carmen Carcelén-Fraile; Elena López-Ruiz Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-08-21 Impact factor: 6.208