Literature DB >> 15953892

Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.

Egle Tatarunaite1, Rebecca Playle, Kerry Hood, William Shaw, Stephen Richmond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate various factors that might affect facial attractiveness from ages 11 to 31 years.
METHODS: Sixty subjects were selected from a sample participating in the longitudinal Cardiff Survey. Three-quarter-view facial photographs were taken of the subjects smiling and not smiling. Photos were taken in 1981, when the subjects were aged 11 years, and in 2001, when they were aged 31. Twelve judges used a 9-point Likert scale to evaluate overall facial attractiveness and the attractiveness of various facial features. The judges were also asked to estimate the adults' ages. Univariate and multivariate statistical tests and the generalizability theory were used. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Overall facial attractiveness does not depend on any single feature; smiling and youthful facial appearance make women look more attractive; facial attractiveness tends to decrease over time from ages 11 to 31; people tend to retain their relative levels of attractiveness throughout their life spans; orthodontic treatment improves dental appearance, but it does not necessarily make a person more attractive in the long term. Nevertheless, the positive effect of orthodontic treatment could still be observed, especially in men with lower levels of facial attractiveness in childhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15953892     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  20 in total

1.  FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND LIFETIME EARNINGS: EVIDENCE FROM A COHORT STUDY.

Authors:  John Karl Scholz; Kamil Sicinski
Journal:  Rev Econ Stat       Date:  2015-03-02

2.  The Philadelphia Face Perception Battery.

Authors:  Amy L Thomas; Kathy Lawler; Ingrid R Olson; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Assessment of Facial Golden Proportions among North Maharashtri-an Population.

Authors:  L N Sunilkumar; Kalpana S Jadhav; Girish Nazirkar; Shailendra Singh; Pradnya S Nagmode; Fareedi Mukram Ali
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-06-23

4.  [Effect of body image in adolescent orthodontic treatment].

Authors:  Peng Minghui; Kang Jing; Deng Xiao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-10-01

5.  Association of overjet and overbite with esthetic impairments of oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ira Sierwald; Mike T John; Oliver Schierz; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Daniel R Reissmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Adults with siblings like children's faces more than those without.

Authors:  Lizhu Luo; Keith M Kendrick; Hong Li; Kang Lee
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-10-11

7.  Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Ulrich Gross; Linda Frye; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  J von Bremen; C Erbe; H Pancherz; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.

Authors:  David C Havens; James A McNamara; Lauren M Sigler; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Perception of Smile Esthetics by Orthodontists and Laypersons: Full Face and A Localized View of The Social and Spontaneous Smiles.

Authors:  Furkan Dindaroğlu; Aslıhan M Ertan Erdinç; Servet Doğan
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.