Literature DB >> 15952512

Assessing protected area effectiveness using surrounding (buffer) areas environmentally similar to the target area.

Jean-François Mas1.   

Abstract

Many studies are based on the assumption that an area and its surrounding (buffer) area present similar environmental conditions and can be compared. For example, in order to assess the effectiveness of a protected area, the land use/cover changes are compared inside the park with its surroundings. However, the heterogeneity in spatial variables can bias this assessment: we have shown that most of the protected areas in Mexico present significant environmental differences between their interior and their surroundings. Therefore, a comparison that aims at assessing the effectiveness of conservation strategies, must be cautioned. In this paper, a simple method which allows the generation of a buffer area that presents similar conditions with respect to a set of environmental variables is presented. The method was used in order to assess the effectiveness of the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, a protected area located in the south-eastern part of Mexico. The annual rate of deforestation inside the protected area, the standard buffer area (based upon distance from the protected area only) and the similar buffer area (taking into account distance along with some environmental variables) were 0.3, 1.3 and 0.6%, respectively. These results showed that the protected area was effective in preventing land clearing, but that the comparison with the standard buffer area gave an over-optimistic vision of its effectiveness.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15952512     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-3156-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  7 in total

1.  Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas.

Authors:  J Liu; M Linderman; Z Ouyang; L An; J Yang; H Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Systematic conservation planning.

Authors:  C R Margules; R L Pressey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.

Authors:  A G Bruner; R E Gullison; R E Rice; G A da Fonseca
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The effectiveness of parks.

Authors:  J K Vanclay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Monitoring and assessment of land use status by GIS.

Authors:  Hasan Ozcan; Mahmut Cetin; Kenan Diker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Landcare GIS: Evaluating Land Management Programs in Australia.

Authors:  J East; M Wood
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  An ecosystem report on the Panama Canal: monitoring the status of the forest communities and the watershed.

Authors:  Roberto Ibáñez; Richard Condit; George Angehr; Salomón Aguilar; Tomas García; Raul Martínez; Amelia Sanjur; Robert Stallard; S Joseph Wright; A Stanley Rand; Stanley Heckadon
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.513

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation.

Authors:  Kwaw S Andam; Paul J Ferraro; Alexander Pfaff; G Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa; Juan A Robalino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Changes in determinants of deforestation and forest degradation in Popa Mountain Park, Central Myanmar.

Authors:  Naing Zaw Htun; Nobuya Mizoue; Shigejiro Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Change in landscape and ecosystems services as the basis of monitoring natural protected areas: a case study in the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain).

Authors:  Carlos L De Pablo; Miguel Peñalver-Alcázar; Pilar Martín De Agar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Effectiveness of nature reserve system for conserving tropical forests: a statistical evaluation of Hainan Island, China.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Peter Pechacek; Mingxia Zhang; Nengwen Xiao; Jianguo Zhu; Junsheng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Global protected area impacts.

Authors:  Lucas N Joppa; Alexander Pfaff
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Evaluating interactions of forest conservation policies on avoided deforestation.

Authors:  Juan Robalino; Catalina Sandoval; David N Barton; Adriana Chacon; Alexander Pfaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China.

Authors:  Zhifeng Zhang; Yuping Tang; Hongyi Pan; Caiyi Yao; Tianyi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.

Authors:  Alison E Beresford; George W Eshiamwata; Paul F Donald; Andrew Balmford; Bastian Bertzky; Andreas B Brink; Lincoln D C Fishpool; Philippe Mayaux; Ben Phalan; Dario Simonetti; Graeme M Buchanan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Role of Protected Areas in the Avoidance of Anthropogenic Conversion in a High Pressure Region: A Matching Method Analysis in the Core Region of the Brazilian Cerrado.

Authors:  Rodrigo José Oliveira Paiva; Ricardo Seixas Brites; Ricardo Bomfim Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.