Literature DB >> 15952393

Preparation and evaluation of GAC-based iron-containing adsorbents for arsenic removal.

Zhimang Gu1, Jun Fang, Baolin Deng.   

Abstract

Granular activated carbon-based, iron-containing adsorbents (As-GAC) were developed for effective removal of arsenic from drinking water. Granular activated carbon (GAC) was used primarily as a supporting medium for ferric iron that was impregnated by ferrous chloride (FeCl2) treatment, followed by chemical oxidation. Sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) was the most effective oxidant, and carbons produced from steam activation of lignite were most suitable for iron impregnation and arsenic removal. Two As-GAC materials prepared by FeCl2 treatment (0.025 -0.40 M) of Dacro 20 x 50 and Dacro 20 x 40LI resulted in a maximum impregnated iron of 7.89% for Dacro 20 x 50 and 7.65% for Dacro 20 x 40Ll. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analyses showed the BET specific surface area, total pore volume, porosity, and average mesoporous diameter all decreased with iron impregnation, indicating that some micropores were blocked. SEM studies with associated EDS indicated that the distribution of iron in the adsorbents was mainly on the edge of As-GAC in the low iron content (approximately 1% Fe) sample but extended to the center at the higher iron content (approximately 6% Fe). When the iron content was > approximately 7%, an iron ring formed at the edge of the GAC particles. No difference in X-ray diffraction patterns was observed between untreated GAC and the one with 4.12% iron, suggesting that the impregnated iron was predominantly in amorphous form. As-GAC could remove arsenic most efficiently when the iron content was approximately 6%; further increases of iron decreased arsenic adsorption. The removal of arsenate occurred in a wide range of pH as examined from 4.4 to 11, but efficiency was decreased when pH was higher than 9.0. The presence of phosphate and silicate could significantly decrease arsenate removal at pH > 8.5, while the effects of sulfate, chloride, and fluoride were minimal. Column studies showed that both As(V) and As(III) could be removed to below 10 microg/L within 6000 empty bed volume when the groundwater containing approximately 50 microg/L of arsenic was treated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15952393     DOI: 10.1021/es048179r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  Development of bark-based magnetic iron oxide particle (BMIOP), a bio-adsorbent for removal of arsenic (III) from water.

Authors:  Rajesh Manoharrao Dhoble; Pratap Reddy Maddigapu; Anand Govind Bhole; Sadhana Rayalu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Production, characterization and effectiveness of cellulose acetate functionalized ZnO nanocomposite adsorbent for the removal of Se (VI) ions from aqueous media.

Authors:  Padmalaya Gurunathan; Sivaram Hari; Sreeja Balakrishnapillai Suseela; Radha Sankararajan; Arivanandan Mukannan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Decontamination of arsenic(V)-contained liquid phase utilizing Fe3O4/bone char nanocomposite encapsulated in chitosan biopolymer.

Authors:  Reza Darvishi Cheshmeh Soltani; Mahdi Safari; Afshin Maleki; Reza Rezaee; Behzad Shahmoradi; Siran Shahmohammadi; Esmail Ghahramani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Ultra-long Magnetic Nanochains for Highly Efficient Arsenic Removal from Water.

Authors:  Gautom Kumar Das; Cecile S Bonifacio; Julius De Rojas; Kai Liu; Klaus van Benthem; Ian M Kennedy
Journal:  J Mater Chem A Mater       Date:  2014-08-28

5.  Low-cost magnetic adsorbent for As(III) removal from water: adsorption kinetics and isotherms.

Authors:  Sarita Kango; Rajesh Kumar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Arsenic removal using natural biomaterial-based sorbents.

Authors:  Linda Ansone; Maris Klavins; Arturs Viksna
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption of phosphate onto iron-doped activated carbon.

Authors:  Zhengfang Wang; Er Nie; Jihua Li; Mo Yang; Yongjun Zhao; Xingzhang Luo; Zheng Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Biochar Supported Nanoscale Iron Particles for the Efficient Removal of Methyl Orange Dye in Aqueous Solutions.

Authors:  Lu Han; Song Xue; Shichen Zhao; Jingchun Yan; Linbo Qian; Mengfang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Iron supported on bioinspired green silica for water remediation.

Authors:  Khalid M Alotaibi; Lewis Shiels; Laure Lacaze; Tanya A Peshkur; Peter Anderson; Libor Machala; Kevin Critchley; Siddharth V Patwardhan; Lorraine T Gibson
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Arsenic(III) Removal by Nanostructured Dialdehyde Cellulose-Cysteine Microscale and Nanoscale Fibers.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Sunil K Sharma; Priyanka R Sharma; Heidi Yeh; Ken Johnson; Benjamin S Hsiao
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.