Literature DB >> 15952189

Microarray versus conventional prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal carcinoma.

Roland S Croner1, Andrea Peters, Wolfgang M Brueckl, Klaus E Matzel, Ludger Klein-Hitpass, Thomas Brabletz, Thomas Papadopoulos, Werner Hohenberger, Bertram Reingruber, Berthold Lausen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated whether microarray-based gene expression analysis of primary tumor biopsy material could be used to predict lymph node status in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Lymphatic metastasis strongly determines treatment algorithms in CRC. Currently, postoperative histology results are needed to determine lymph node status. Reliable preoperative information would be useful to advance treatment strategies.
METHODS: In specimens from 66 patients with CRC from the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Cancer, 41 shock-frozen samples of International Union Against Cancer (UICC) Stage I-II CRC and 25 samples of UICC Stage III CRC were microdissected manually, RNA was isolated, and gene chips (HG-U133A; Affymetrix) were hybridized. Prediction rates for lymphatic metastasis were calculated using conventional clinicopathologic parameters, gene expression data, and a combination of both. Prediction error, specificity, and sensitivity were analyzed using six different statistical classifiers.
RESULTS: Analysis of conventional parameters produced a positive prediction rate that ranged between 53% and 61%, sensitivity of 42%, and specificity of 72%. Microarray prediction rates were between 62% and 67% for lymphatic metastasis. Specificity was between 76% and 83%, and sensitivity was between 38% and 48%, depending on the statistical procedure. The conventional estimates were improved by 9-12% when array data were added.
CONCLUSIONS: Current data show that the prediction of lymphatic metastasis can be improved by gene expression profiling of the primary tumor biopsy, alone or in combination with conventional parameters. Gene expression profiling may become valuable increasingly in planning treatment for patients with CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15952189     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

1.  Molecular staging estimates occult tumor burden in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.394

Review 2.  Is occult lymph node disease in colorectal cancer patients clinically significant? A review of the relevant literature.

Authors:  Daniel G Nicastri; John T Doucette; Tony E Godfrey; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  Molecular staging individualizing cancer management.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Guidelines for biomarker testing in colorectal carcinoma (CRC): a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).

Authors:  Pilar García-Alfonso; Ramón Salazar; Jesús García-Foncillas; Eva Musulén; Rocío García-Carbonero; Artemio Payá; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Santiago Ramón y Cajal; Samuel Navarro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  GUCY2C molecular staging personalizes colorectal cancer patient management.

Authors:  Jian P Gong; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.851

6.  Gene expression profiling reveals a massive, aneuploidy-dependent transcriptional deregulation and distinct differences between lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive colon carcinomas.

Authors:  Marian Grade; Patrick Hörmann; Sandra Becker; Amanda B Hummon; Danny Wangsa; Sudhir Varma; Richard Simon; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Becker; Michael J Difilippantonio; B Michael Ghadimi; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Evolution in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver.

Authors:  Charlotte-E Ariyan; Ronald-R Salem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Guanylyl cyclase C as a biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Terry Hyslop; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

9.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: correlation of a gene expression-based response signature with recurrence.

Authors:  Torsten Liersch; Marian Grade; Jochen Gaedcke; Sudhir Varma; Michael J Difilippantonio; Claus Langer; Clemens F Hess; Heinz Becker; Thomas Ried; B Michael Ghadimi
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Association of GUCY2C expression in lymph nodes with time to recurrence and disease-free survival in pN0 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Scott A Waldman; Terry Hyslop; Stephanie Schulz; Alan Barkun; Karl Nielsen; Janis Haaf; Christine Bonaccorso; Yanyan Li; David S Weinberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.