BACKGROUND & AIMS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant interferon-beta-1a (rIFN-beta-1a) in outpatients with active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Ninety-one randomized patients subcutaneously received 3 MIU rIFN-beta-1a (group A, n = 32), 1 MIU rIFN-beta-1a (group B, n = 30), or placebo (group C, n = 29) 3 times a week over a period of 8 weeks in addition to standard therapy. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment. RESULTS: In all 3 groups, the median prestudy clinical activity index (CAI) was 10. In 18 of 32 patients (56%) in group A, in 11 of 30 patients (36%) in group B, and in 10 of 29 patients (34%) in group C, a reduction of the CAI of 6 points or greater (response) was achieved (differences were not statistically significant). Complete response (reduction of CAI to < or =4) was achieved in 56%, 30%, and 38% of patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Compared with baseline, the median endoscopic index had been reduced by 5, 3, and 4 points in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Steroid reduction was 12 mg in group A, 6 mg in group B, and 10 mg in group C. Identical side effects occurred in all 3 groups. Seven serious adverse events were reported (1 in group A and 6 in group C). All were unrelated to therapy as judged by the investigating physicians. CONCLUSIONS: rIFN-beta-1a was safe but not significant, at the dosage and/or duration of treatment used, in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Further studies are indicated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant interferon-beta-1a (rIFN-beta-1a) in outpatients with active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Ninety-one randomized patients subcutaneously received 3 MIU rIFN-beta-1a (group A, n = 32), 1 MIU rIFN-beta-1a (group B, n = 30), or placebo (group C, n = 29) 3 times a week over a period of 8 weeks in addition to standard therapy. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment. RESULTS: In all 3 groups, the median prestudy clinical activity index (CAI) was 10. In 18 of 32 patients (56%) in group A, in 11 of 30 patients (36%) in group B, and in 10 of 29 patients (34%) in group C, a reduction of the CAI of 6 points or greater (response) was achieved (differences were not statistically significant). Complete response (reduction of CAI to < or =4) was achieved in 56%, 30%, and 38% of patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Compared with baseline, the median endoscopic index had been reduced by 5, 3, and 4 points in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Steroid reduction was 12 mg in group A, 6 mg in group B, and 10 mg in group C. Identical side effects occurred in all 3 groups. Seven serious adverse events were reported (1 in group A and 6 in group C). All were unrelated to therapy as judged by the investigating physicians. CONCLUSIONS: rIFN-beta-1a was safe but not significant, at the dosage and/or duration of treatment used, in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Further studies are indicated.
Authors: Peter J Mannon; Ronald L Hornung; Zhiqiong Yang; Chuli Yi; Catherine Groden; Julia Friend; Michael Yao; Warren Strober; Ivan J Fuss Journal: Gut Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Jay Luther; Stephanie Y Owyang; Tomomi Takeuchi; Tyler S Cole; Min Zhang; Maochang Liu; John Erb-Downward; Joel H Rubenstein; Chun-Chia Chen; Anna V Pierzchala; Jose A Paul; John Y Kao Journal: Gut Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 23.059