Literature DB >> 15952051

The spontaneous-rate histogram of the auditory nerve can be explained by only two or three spontaneous rates and long-range dependence.

B Scott Jackson1, Laurel H Carney.   

Abstract

Estimates of the spontaneous discharge rate (SR) of auditory-nerve (AN) fibers are often based on measurements of the average rate over a long (e.g., 30 s) interval. These measurements are important because SR is apparently correlated with other AN properties, such as threshold to acoustic stimuli, shape of rate-level function, recovery from prior stimulation, and certain anatomical characteristics. Furthermore, histograms of SR estimates from large numbers of fibers suggest that they can be divided into two (i.e., low and high) or three (i.e., low, medium, and high) SR classes. Yet, even "simple" statistical estimates, such as average rate, can behave surprisingly poorly for processes with long-range dependence (LRD), which has been found in the spontaneous activity of AN fibers. In particular, LRD greatly increases the variability of estimates of mean discharge rate. We investigated the implications of this effect of LRD for our understanding of the SRs of AN fibers. The fractional-Gaussian-noise-driven Poisson process (fGnDP) was originally developed to model the LRD action-potential trains of AN fibers. Using rate estimates computed from this model, we were able to reproduce the shape of published histograms of SR using only three fixed SR values. Moreover, by using a Poisson-equivalent integrate-and-fire (IF) model in place of the inhomogeneous Poisson process in the fGnDP model, we were able to reproduce SR histograms using only two fixed SR values. These results suggest that AN fibers may have only two or three possible values for their long-term average spontaneous discharge rates. In other words, all "high-SR" neurons may actually have the same underlying SR. Furthermore, both "low-SR" and "medium-SR" neurons may have a single "true" SR value, or these two classes may have two different "true" SR values. Furthermore, the Poisson-equivalent IF model may prove useful in other applications involving the modeling of trains of action potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15952051      PMCID: PMC2538337          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-5045-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  20 in total

1.  Spatial organization of the auditory nerve according to spontaneous discharge rate.

Authors:  T Kawase; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1992-05-08       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Central projections of auditory-nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate. I. Anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1991-11-08       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The periodogram and Allan variance reveal fractal exponents greater than unity in auditory-nerve spike trains.

Authors:  S B Lowen; M C Teich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Fractal character of the auditory neural spike train.

Authors:  M C Teich
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Central projections of intracellularly labeled auditory nerve fibers in cats: morphometric correlations with physiological properties.

Authors:  D K Ryugo; E M Rouiller
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  The projections of intracellularly labeled auditory nerve fibers to the dorsal cochlear nucleus of cats.

Authors:  D K Ryugo; S K May
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Central projections of auditory nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate, II: Posteroventral and dorsal cochlear nuclei.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1993-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Spatial organization of inner hair cell synapses and cochlear spiral ganglion neurons.

Authors:  P A Leake; R L Snyder; G T Hradek
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1993-07-08       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Analyzing and modeling fractal intensity point processes.

Authors:  A R Kumar; D H Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spontaneous activity of auditory-nerve fibers: insights into stochastic processes at ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Dexter R F Irvine; Mel Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.

Authors:  Michael R Wirtzfeld; Rasha A Ibrahim; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-26

4.  Ion channel noise can explain firing correlation in auditory nerves.

Authors:  Bahar Moezzi; Nicolangelo Iannella; Mark D McDonnell
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Power-law dynamics in an auditory-nerve model can account for neural adaptation to sound-level statistics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Evaluating adaptation and olivocochlear efferent feedback as potential explanations of psychophysical overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-26

7.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

Review 9.  Animal models of spontaneous activity in the healthy and impaired auditory system.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Modeling the influence of short term depression in vesicle release and stochastic calcium channel gating on auditory nerve spontaneous firing statistics.

Authors:  Bahar Moezzi; Nicolangelo Iannella; Mark D McDonnell
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.380

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.