Literature DB >> 15951649

A prospective cost-effectiveness study of trigeminal neuralgia surgery.

Bruce E Pollock1, Robert D Ecker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 8000 patients with trigeminal neuralgia undergo surgery each year in the United States at an estimated cost exceeding $100 million. We compared 3 commonly performed surgeries (microvascular decompression, glycerol rhizotomy, and stereotactic radiosurgery) to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of these operations for patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.
METHODS: Prospective nonrandomized trial at a tertiary referral center from July 1999 to December 2001. One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients underwent 153 operations (microvascular decompression, n=33; glycerol rhizotomy, n=51; stereotactic radiosurgery, n=69). Preoperative characteristics were similar between the groups with respect to sex, pain location, duration of pain, and atypical features. Facial pain outcomes were classified as excellent (no pain, no medications), good (no pain, reduced medications), fair (>50% pain reduction), and poor. The cost per quality adjusted pain-free year was compared between the groups. Mean follow-up was 20.6 months.
RESULTS: Patients having microvascular decompression more commonly achieved and maintained an excellent outcome (85% and 78% at 6 and 24 months) compared with glycerol rhizotomy (61% and 55%, P=0.01) and stereotactic radiosurgery (60% and 52%, P<0.01). No difference was detected between glycerol rhizotomy and stereotactic radiosurgery (P=0.61). The cost per quality adjusted pain-free year was $6,342, $8,174, and $8,269 for glycerol rhizotomy, microvascular decompression, and stereotactic radiosurgery, respectively. Reduction in the average cost of morbidity and additional surgeries to zero did not make either microvascular decompression or stereotactic radiosurgery more cost-effective than glycerol rhizotomy. Both microvascular decompression and stereotactic radiosurgery would be more cost-effective than glycerol rhizotomy if the cost of additional surgeries after glycerol rhizotomy increased 79% and 83%, respectively. DISCUSSION: This analysis supports the practice of percutaneous surgeries for older patients with medically unresponsive trigeminal neuralgia. At longer follow-up intervals, microvascular decompression is predicted to be the most cost-effective surgery and should be considered the preferred operation for patients if their risk for general anesthesia is acceptable. More data are needed to assess the role that radiosurgery should play in the management of patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951649     DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000125267.40304.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is There a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Discernible Cause for Trigeminal Neuralgia? A Structured Review.

Authors:  Judy Alper; Raj K Shrivastava; Priti Balchandani
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Predictive nomogram for the durability of pain relief from gamma knife radiation surgery in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  John T Lucas; Adrian M Nida; Scott Isom; Kopriva Marshall; John D Bourland; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Comparative evaluation of surgical procedures for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Monika Parmar; Neha Sharma; Vikas Modgill; Purushotham Naidu
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-11-29

Review 4.  Neuropathic pain: quality-of-life impact, costs and cost effectiveness of therapy.

Authors:  Alec B O'Connor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Pharmacological versus microvascular decompression approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical outcomes and direct costs.

Authors:  Laurinda Lemos; Carlos Alegria; Joana Oliveira; Ana Machado; Pedro Oliveira; Armando Almeida
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 6.  Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Identify Trigeminal System Abnormalities in Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Danielle D DeSouza; Mojgan Hodaie; Karen D Davis
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.856

7.  Microvascular Decompression Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Ian Berger; Nikhil Nayak; James Schuster; John Lee; Sherman Stein; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-01-26

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for trigeminal neuralgia: Cyberknife vs microvascular decompression.

Authors:  Rosanna Tarricone; Giovanni Aguzzi; Francesco Musi; Laura Fariselli; Andrea Casasco
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 9.  Assessing and treating primary headaches and cranio-facial pain in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases.

Authors:  Cristina Tassorelli; Marco Tramontano; Mariangela Berlangieri; Vittorio Schweiger; Mariagrazia D'Ippolito; Valerio Palmerini; Sara Bonazza; Riccardo Rosa; Rosanna Cerbo; Maria Gabriella Buzzi
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.277

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.