Literature DB >> 15951520

Conceptual issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs.

Gary J Young1, Bert White, James F Burgess, Dan Berlowitz, Mark Meterko, Matthew R Guldin, Barbara G Bokhour.   

Abstract

This article identifies and discusses key conceptual issues in designing and implementing pay-for-quality programs. Such programs offer financial incentives to providers for achieving predefined quality targets. The purpose of the article is to provide health care professionals with a framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating pay-for-quality programs. Examples are drawn from the Rewarding Results demonstration project for which the authors serve as the national evaluation team.

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 15951520     DOI： 10.1177/1062860605275222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN： 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  14 in total

1.  Provider attitudes toward pay-for-performance programs: development and validation of a measurement instrument.

Authors:  Mark Meterko; Gary J Young; Bert White; Barbara G Bokhour; James F Burgess; Dan Berlowitz; Matthew R Guldin; Marjorie Nealon Seibert
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  CMS changes in reimbursement for HAIs: setting a research agenda.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Sherry A Glied; Peter D McNair; Nikolas Matthes; Bevin Cohen; Timothy F Landers; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Medicare non-payment of hospital-acquired infections: infection rates three years post implementation.

Authors:  Samuel K Peasah; Niccie L McKay; Jeffrey S Harman; Mona Al-Amin; Robert L Cook
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2013-09-25

4.  The Quality and Outcomes Framework and self-management dialogue in primary care consultations: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tom Blakeman; Carolyn Chew-Graham; David Reeves; Anne Rogers; Peter Bower
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stephen M Campbell; Ruth McDonald; Helen Lester
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Implementation of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study 8 years after introduction.

Authors:  Helen Lester; Tatum Matharu; Mohammed A Mohammed; David Lester; Rachel Foskett-Tharby
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  A comparison of chronic illness care quality in US and UK family medicine practices prior to pay-for-performance initiatives.

Authors:  Jesse C Crosson; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Stephen Campbell; Robert L Phillips; Martin O Roland; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Andrew Bazemore; Bijal Balasubramanian; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs.

Authors:  Frank Eijkenaar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-09-01

9.  Predicting healthcare employees' participation in an office redesign program: attitudes, norms and behavioral control.

Authors:  David C Mohr; Carol VanDeusen Lukas; Mark Meterko
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Design of price incentives for adjunct policy goals in formula funding for hospitals and health services.

Authors:  Stephen J Duckett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 2.655
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.