Literature DB >> 15951406

Clinical and angiographic results of dilatation procedures for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Adnan I Qureshi1, M Fareed K Suri, Amir M Siddiqui, Stanley H Kim, Alan S Boulos, Andrew J Ringer, Demetrius K Lopes, Lee R Guterman, L Nelson Hopkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The authors determined the technical success and the clinical and angiographic results of angioplasty and/or stent placement for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) at a tertiary-care referral hospital.
METHODS: Angiographic and clinical outcomes occurring within the 1-month follow-up interval were recorded. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 20.5 +/- 9.2 months, and a neurovascular imaging study was performed in 18 of the 21 patients alive after a mean period of 19.7 +/- 9.2 months. Stroke-free survival and ipsilateral stroke-prevention rates were estimated using Kaplan Meier analyses.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (mean age = 61.0 +/- 13.5 years; 15 were men) underwent 30 procedures for treatment of ICAD. The procedures included angioplasty (n = 18) and attempted primary stent placement (n = 14). In 2 procedures, angioplasty was performed in the same session after unsuccessful stent placement. There was immediate stenosis reduction (mean +/- SD) from 84% +/- 17% to 27% +/- 21%. The overall 1-month composite rate of major stroke, death, and major bleeding complications was 7% for the 30 procedures. Overall stroke-free survival at 36 months was estimated as 79% (95% confidence interval, 57%-91%), and the ipsilateral stroke-prevention rate was estimated to be 87% (95% confidence interval, 65%-95%). Among the 15 patients who underwent repeat angiography, restenosis requiring second intervention was observed in 1 patient. No restenosis could be identified in 3 patients who underwent computed tomographic or magnetic resonance angiography.
CONCLUSION: This single-center study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness (for secondary stroke prevention) of angioplasty and/or stent placement for treatment of ICAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951406     DOI: 10.1177/1051228405277343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  7 in total

Review 1.  Point-of-care testing for anticoagulation monitoring in neuroendovascular procedures.

Authors:  H M Hussein; A L Georgiadis; A I Qureshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Balloon Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Lakshmi Sudha Prasanna Karanam; Mukesh Sharma; Anand Alurkar; Sridhar Reddy Baddam; Vijaya Pamidimukkala; Raghavasarma Polavarapu
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-06

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of intracranial stent placement versus contemporary medical management in patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.

Authors:  Amir Khan; Ameer Hassan; Fareed Suri; Adnan Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-12

4.  Influence of angioplasty and stenting on intracranial artery stenosis: preliminary results of high-resolution vessel wall imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Wu; Chih-Ping Chung; Ting-Yi Chen; Kai-Wei Yu; Te-Ming Lin; Wei-An Tai; Chao-Bao Luo; Feng-Chi Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Monitoring of the heparinization in the rabbit animal model during endovascular interventions.

Authors:  Anne J Schmitt; Anna K Wallner; Shahrzad Afazel; Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis.

Authors:  S Cruz-Flores; A L Diamond
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

7.  Critical appraisal of medical devices in the management of cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Michael J Schneck
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.