Literature DB >> 15951366

Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures.

Andrew Karpinski1, Ross B Steinman, James L Hilton.   

Abstract

The authors examined attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and explicit attitude measures. In Study 1 (N = 194), as ratings of attitude importance regarding the 2000 presidential election increased, the strength of the relationship between a Bush-Gore IAT and explicit attitude measures also increased. Study 2 provided a conceptual replication of these results using attitudes toward Coke and Pepsi (N = 112). In addition, across both studies, explicit attitude measures were better predictors of deliberative behaviors than IAT scores. In Study 3 (N = 77), the authors examined the role of elaboration as a mechanism by which attitude importance may moderate IAT-explicit attitude correlations. As predicted, increased elaboration resulted in stronger IAT-explicit attitude correlations. Other possible mechanisms by which attitude importance may moderate the IAT-explicit attitude relationship also are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951366     DOI: 10.1177/0146167204273007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  6 in total

1.  Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

2.  Implicit Attitudes towards People with Intellectual Disabilities: Their Relationship with Explicit Attitudes, Social Distance, Emotions and Contact.

Authors:  Michelle Clare Wilson; Katrina Scior
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.

Authors:  Livio Raccuia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?

Authors:  Malte Friese; Colin Tucker Smith; Thomas Plischke; Matthias Bluemke; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: a methodology study.

Authors:  Andrea Petróczi; Eugene V Aidman; Tamás Nepusz
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2008-04-21

6.  Neural predictors of evaluative attitudes toward celebrities.

Authors:  Keise Izuma; Kazuhisa Shibata; Kenji Matsumoto; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.