Literature DB >> 15951310

Treatment of head louse infestation with 4% dimeticone lotion: randomised controlled equivalence trial.

Ian F Burgess1, Christine M Brown, Peter N Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4% dimeticone lotion for treatment of head louse infestation.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled equivalence trial.
SETTING: Community, with home visits. PARTICIPANTS: 214 young people aged 4 to 18 years and 39 adults with active head louse infestation.
INTERVENTIONS: Two applications seven days apart of either 4.0% dimeticone lotion, applied for eight hours or overnight, or 0.5% phenothrin liquid, applied for 12 hours or overnight. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cure of infestation (no evidence of head lice after second treatment) or reinfestation after cure.
RESULTS: Cure or reinfestation after cure occurred in 89 of 127 (70%) participants treated with dimeticone and 94 of 125 (75%) treated with phenothrin (difference -5%, 95% confidence interval -16% to 6%). Per protocol analysis showed that 84 of 121 (69%) participants were cured with dimeticone and 90 of 116 (78%) were cured with phenothrin. Irritant reactions occurred significantly less with dimeticone (3/127, 2%) than with phenothrin (11/125, 9%; difference -6%, -12% to -1%). Per protocol this was 3 of 121 (3%) participants treated with dimeticone and 10 of 116 (9%) treated with phenothrin (difference -6%, -12% to -0.3%).
CONCLUSION: Dimeticone lotion cures head louse infestation. Dimeticone seems less irritant than existing treatments and has a physical action on lice that should not be affected by resistance to neurotoxic insecticides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951310      PMCID: PMC558378          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38497.506481.8F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  9 in total

1.  Treatment of head lice.

Authors:  J Ibarra; F Fry; C Wickenden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-12-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Head lice: prevalence in schoolchildren and insecticide resistance.

Authors:  A M Downs; K A Stafford; G C Coles
Journal:  Parasitol Today       Date:  1999-01

3.  The methodology and operation of a pilot randomized control trial of the effectiveness of the Bug Busting method against a single application insecticide product for head louse treatment.

Authors:  P Bingham; S Kirk; N Hill; J Figueroa
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Head lice resistant to pyrethroid insecticides in Britain.

Authors:  I F Burgess; C M Brown; S Peock; J Kaufman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-16

5.  An observer-blinded study of 1% permethrin creme rinse with and without adjunctive combing in patients with head lice.

Authors:  Terri L Meinking; Coleen M Clineschmidt; Cong Chen; Michael A Kolber; Robert W Tipping; Christine I Furtek; Maria Elena Villar; Cynthia A Guzzo
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Head lice infestation: bug busting vs. traditional treatment.

Authors:  L Plastow; M Luthra; R Powell; J Wright; D Russell; M N Marshall
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Louse comb versus direct visual examination for the diagnosis of head louse infestations.

Authors:  K Y Mumcuoglu; M Friger; I Ioffe-Uspensky; F Ben-Ishai; J Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Evidence for double resistance to permethrin and malathion in head lice.

Authors:  A M Downs; K A Stafford; I Harvey; G C Coles
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Comparison of wet combing with malathion for treatment of head lice in the UK: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  R J Roberts; D Casey; D A Morgan; M Petrovic
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  34 in total

1.  Combing and combating head lice.

Authors:  Martin Dawes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-13

2.  Surveillance of insecticide resistance in head lice using biochemical and molecular methods.

Authors:  D Rh Thomas; L McCarroll; R Roberts; P Karunaratne; C Roberts; D Casey; S Morgan; K Touhig; J Morgan; F Collins; J Hemingway
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Is wet combing effective in children with pediculosis capitis infestation?

Authors:  Marc Tebruegge; Jane Runnacles
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Head lice infestations: A clinical update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 5.  Pediculosis capitis: new insights into epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  H Feldmeier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparative efficacy of new commercial pediculicides against adults and eggs of Pediculus humanus capitis (head lice).

Authors:  Anabella Gallardo; Gastón Mougabure-Cueto; Claudia Vassena; María Inés Picollo; Ariel Ceferino Toloza
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 7.  Head Lice.

Authors:  Laura Meister; Falk Ochsendorf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  Head lice.

Authors:  Ian F Burgess
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-05-16

Review 9.  Head lice.

Authors:  Ian F Burgess
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-01-14

10.  A new two-phase dimeticone pediculicide shows high efficacy in a comparative bioassay.

Authors:  Jorg Heukelbach; André Asenov; Oliver Liesenfeld; Ali Mirmohammadsadegh; Fabíola A Oliveira
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2009-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.