Literature DB >> 15951139

Chromosomal rearrangements are associated with higher rates of molecular evolution in mammals.

Tomàs Marques-Bonet1, Arcadi Navarro.   

Abstract

Evolutionary rates are not uniformly distributed across the genome. Knowledge about the biological causes of this observation is still incomplete, but its exploration has provided valuable insight into the genomical, historical and demographical variables that influence rates of genetic divergence. Recent studies suggest a possible association between chromosomal rearrangements and regions of greater divergence, but evidence is limited and contradictory. Here, we test the hypothesis of a relationship between chromosomal rearrangements and higher rates of molecular evolution by studying the genomic distribution of divergence between 12,000 human-mouse orthologous genes. Our results clearly show that genes located in genomic regions that have been highly rearranged between the two species present higher rates of synonymous (0.7686 vs. 0.7076) and non-synonymous substitution (0.1014 vs. 0.0871), and that synonymous substitution rates are higher in genes close to the breakpoints of individual rearrangements. The many potential causes of such striking are discussed, particularly in the light of speciation models suggesting that chromosomal rearrangements may have contributed to some of the speciation processes along the human and mouse lineages. Still, there are other possible causes and further research is needed to properly explore them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951139     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of human chromosome 19q13 and syntenic region on mouse chromosome 7 reveals absence, in man, of 11.6 Mb containing four mouse calcium-sensing receptor-related sequences: relevance to familial benign hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia type 3.

Authors:  Fadil M Hannan; M Andrew Nesbit; Jeremy J O Turner; Joanna M Stacey; Luisella Cianferotti; Paul T Christie; Arthur D Conigrave; Michael P Whyte; Rajesh V Thakker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Similarities and differences among the chromosomes of the wild guinea pig Cavia tschudii and the domestic guinea pig Cavia porcellus (Rodentia, Caviidae).

Authors:  Laura I Walker; Miguel A Soto; Angel E Spotorno
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  Mammalian Comparative Genomics Reveals Genetic and Epigenetic Features Associated with Genome Reshuffling in Rodentia.

Authors:  Laia Capilla; Rosa Ana Sánchez-Guillén; Marta Farré; Andreu Paytuví-Gallart; Roberto Malinverni; Jacint Ventura; Denis M Larkin; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  An exon-based comparative variant analysis pipeline to study the scale and role of frameshift and nonsense mutation in the human-chimpanzee divergence.

Authors:  GongXin Yu
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-10-22

5.  An analysis of the gene complement of a marsupial, Monodelphis domestica: evolution of lineage-specific genes and giant chromosomes.

Authors:  Leo Goodstadt; Andreas Heger; Caleb Webber; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Recombination rates and genomic shuffling in human and chimpanzee--a new twist in the chromosomal speciation theory.

Authors:  Marta Farré; Diego Micheletti; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  On the association between chromosomal rearrangements and genic evolution in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Tomàs Marques-Bonet; Jesús Sànchez-Ruiz; Lluís Armengol; Razi Khaja; Jaume Bertranpetit; Núria Lopez-Bigas; Mariano Rocchi; Elodie Gazave; Arcadi Navarro
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Multiple chromosomal rearrangements structured the ancestral vertebrate Hox-bearing protochromosomes.

Authors:  Vincent J Lynch; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  The genomic distribution of intraspecific and interspecific sequence divergence of human segmental duplications relative to human/chimpanzee chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Tomàs Marques-Bonet; Ze Cheng; Xinwei She; Evan E Eichler; Arcadi Navarro
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Microchromosomes are building blocks of bird, reptile, and mammal chromosomes.

Authors:  Paul D Waters; Hardip R Patel; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Lucía Álvarez-González; Nicholas C Lister; Oleg Simakov; Tariq Ezaz; Parwinder Kaur; Celine Frere; Frank Grützner; Arthur Georges; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.