Literature DB >> 15950686

Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.

Russel C Huang1, Federico P Girardi, Moe R Lim, Frank P Cammisa.   

Abstract

Nonfusion technology in spine surgery may improve outcomes by reducing surgical morbidity and the incidence of adjacent level degeneration; however, new technologies also introduce new short- and long-term complications. There is currently no evidence that nonfusion implants are superior to fusion in mid- to long-term follow-up. Understanding the potential risks and benefits of nonfusion technology is essential for spine surgeons and their patients. This article reviews the current evidence relating to the potential risks and benefits of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15950686     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of BioPlex interbody fusion device in a sheep lumbar fusion model.

Authors:  Douglas C Fredericks; Anup A Gandhi; Nicole M Grosland; Joseph D Smucker
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cédric Y Barrey; Ravi K Ponnappan; Jason Song; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-12-01

3.  Posterior Dynamic Stabilization as a Salvage Procedure for Lumbar Facet Degeneration Following Total Disc Arthroplasty: Case report.

Authors:  Paul Khoueir; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-11-01

4.  Short term outcome of posterior dynamic stabilization system in degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Mingyuan Yang; Chao Li; Ziqiang Chen; Yushu Bai; Ming Li
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Investigation into the biomechanics of lumbar spine micro-dynamic pedicle screw.

Authors:  Chuang Liu; Allieu Kamara; Yunhui Yan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Effects of posterior lumbar nonfusion surgery with isobar devices versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery on clinical and radiological features in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianbin Guan; Tao Liu; Wenhao Li; He Zhao; Kaitan Yang; Chuanhong Li; Ningning Feng; Guozheng Jiang; Yongdong Yang; Xing Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Skipping posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization for distant segment degenerative disease.

Authors:  Bilgehan Solmaz; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Cengiz Gomleksiz; Yaprak Ataker; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-10-03

8.  Posterior Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization versus Total Disc Replacement in the Treatment of Lumbar Painful Degenerative Disc Disease: A Comparison of Clinical Results.

Authors:  Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer; Mehdi Sasani; Yaprak Ataker; Cengiz Gomleksiz; Irfan Celebi
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-01-17

9.  Pedicle-Screw-Based Dynamic Systems and Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: Biomechanical and Clinical Experiences of Dynamic Fusion with Isobar TTL.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Gilles Perrin; Sabina Champain
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-01-21

10.  Characterisation of porous knitted titanium for replacement of intervertebral disc nucleus pulposus.

Authors:  Gauri Tendulkar; Vrinda Sreekumar; Frank Rupp; Arun K Teotia; Kiriaki Athanasopulu; Ralf Kemkemer; Alfred Buck; Alfred Buck; Hans-Peter Kaps; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Ashok Kumar; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.