Literature DB >> 15950631

Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal progesterone capsules (Utrogest 200) compared with progesterone gel (Crinone 8%) for luteal phase support during assisted reproduction.

Jürgen Kleinstein1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of capsules containing 200 mg of P (Utrogest 200) or Crinone 8% gel for luteal phase and early pregnancy support during assisted reproduction techniques (ART).
DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, parallel-group Phase III trial.
SETTING: Seventeen German IVF centers. PATIENT(S): Four hundred thirty women who underwent their first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle were randomized after successful transfer of two or three embryos from July 1999 through September 2001. INTERVENTION(S): Patients vaginally applied capsules containing 200 mg of P (Utrogest 200) three times per day or containing Crinone 8% gel twice per day. Therapy was started in the evening of the ET day and continued up to 10 weeks in pregnant women. If the pregnancy test proved to be negative, application was stopped. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rate at the end of the study (12th week of gestation). Secondary outcomes were rate of implantation and abortion, number and reasons of withdrawals, as well as adverse events, assessment of tolerability, and acceptance. RESULT(S): There were no relevant differences in demographic and other characteristics between the two groups. Ongoing pregnancy rates were 25.2% in the Utrogest 200 group and 22.2% in the Crinone 8% group when patients were analyzed who normally completed the trial. In the Utrogest 200 vs. the Crinone 8% group, the implantation rate (14.7% vs. 11.9%) and abortion rate (18.2% vs. 19.1%) were not statistically different. The rate of withdrawals at the individual visits also did not differ between treatment groups. Tolerability of both drugs was good, and very few study drug-related adverse events were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): The luteal phase support in ART cycles with Utrogest 200 capsules (three times per day) or Crinone 8% gel (two times per day) by the vaginal route resulted in similar outcomes with respect to implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and abortion rates. The two recommended regimens of P supplementation in ART proved to be equivalent and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15950631     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

Review 1.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 3.  Incomplete and inconsistent reporting of maternal and fetal outcomes in infertility treatment trials.

Authors:  Lisa Dapuzzo; Faith E Seitz; William C Dodson; Christina Stetter; Allen R Kunselman; Richard S Legro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Vaginal micronized progesterone capsule versus vaginal progesterone gel for lutheal support in normoresponder IVF/ICSI-ET cycles.

Authors:  Kenan Sofuoglu; Ismet Gun; Sadik Sahin; Okan Ozden; Oktay Tosun; Mustafa Eroglu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 5.  Actions of progestins for the inhibition of cervical ripening and uterine contractions to prevent preterm birth.

Authors:  R-J Kuon; R E Garfield
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

6.  A questionnaire-based audit to assess overall experience and convenience among patients using vaginal progesterone tablets (Lutigest®) for luteal phase support during IVF treatment.

Authors:  Polly Heine; Laura Sellar; Sue Whitten; Priti Bajaj
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2017-12-08

7.  A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Herman Tournaye; Gennady T Sukhikh; Elke Kahler; Georg Griesinger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in In Vitro Fertilization: Comparison of Vaginal and Rectal Pessaries to Vaginal Capsules: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Mohamed Khrouf; Soufiene Slimani; Myriam Razgallah Khrouf; Marouen Braham; Maha Bouyahia; Khadija Kacem Berjeb; Hanene Elloumi Chaabane; Ghaya Merdassi; Aida Zahaf Kaffel; Amel Zhioua; Fethi Zhioua
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Womens Health       Date:  2017-01-05

9.  Vaginal progesterone in risk reduction of preterm birth in women with short cervix in the midtrimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Meena Khandelwal
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-09-14

10.  Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Christophe Blockeel; Gennady T Sukhikh; Ameet Patki; Bharati Dhorepatil; Dong-Zi Yang; Zi-Jiang Chen; Elke Kahler; Claire Pexman-Fieth; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.