Literature DB >> 15950572

Success, safety, and mechanisms of failure of percutaneous coronary intervention for occlusive non-drug-eluting in-stent restenosis versus native artery total occlusion.

Amr E Abbas1, Stacy D Brewington, Simon R Dixon, Judith Boura, Cindy L Grines, William W O'Neill.   

Abstract

We compared the procedural success, mechanism of failure, and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention in 235 procedures for de novo chronic total occlusions with 78 procedures for chronic occlusive in-stent restenosis. Despite similar rates of procedural success and safety profile, angiographic predictors of successful percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo chronic total occlusions played a limited role in patients who had chronic occlusive in-stent restenosis, and the mechanisms of failure were different.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 15950572     DOI： 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN： 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhang; Zheng Wu; Shaoping Wang; Tong Liu; Jinghua Liu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.947

2.  The efficacy of "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: insights from a US multicenter registry.

Authors:  Georgios Christopoulos; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; William L Lombardi; J Aaron Grantham; Bavana V Rangan; Anna P Kotsia; Nicholas Lembo; David E Kandzari; James Lee; Anna Kalynych; Harold Carlson; Santiago Garcia; Subhash Banerjee; Craig A Thompson; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Initial clinical experience of CrossBoss catheter for in-stent chronic total occlusion lesions: A case report.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Long-Bo Li; Zhi-Hui Wang; Yong-Feng Shi; Jun-Duo Wu; Ji-Chang Zhang; Bin Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  A comparison of procedural success rate and long-term clinical outcomes between in-stent restenosis chronic total occlusion and de novo chronic total occlusion using multicenter registry data.

Authors:  Seung Hun Lee; Jae Young Cho; Je Sang Kim; Hyun Jong Lee; Jeong Hoon Yang; Jae Hyoung Park; Soon Jun Hong; Rak Kyeong Choi; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Do-Sun Lim; Cheol Woong Yu
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion.

Authors:  Guodong Tang; Naixin Zheng; Guojian Yang; Hui Li; Hu Ai; Ying Zhao; Fucheng Sun; Huiping Zhang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.