Literature DB >> 15949243

Changes in hemodynamics during isoflurane and propofol anesthesia: a comparison study.

G De Cosmo1, I Cancelli, A Adduci, G Merlino, P Aceto, M Valente.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Volatile anesthetics are thought to impair cerebral autoregulation more than i.v. anesthetics. However, few comparative studies have been carried out in humans. The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in cerebral hemodynamic changes after introduction of isoflurane (a volatile anesthetic) and propofol (an i.v. anesthetic).
METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected. After the induction, anesthesia was maintained by isoflurane (one minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration) during the first part of the surgical operation, and then by propofol (5 mg/kg/hour i.v.). Ventilation was adjusted to maintain a constant end-tidal CO(2). Middle artery flow velocity was assessed by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate (HR), capnometry, pulse oxymetry, inspired fraction of O(2), and body temperature, were monitored.
RESULTS: Cerebral artery velocity, HR, and mean arterial pressure all significantly increased from baseline after the introduction of isoflurane (p<0.05); the HR and mean arterial blood pressure showed no significant difference between the isoflurane and propofol phases. Isoflurane anesthesia induced a significant increase in cerebral blood velocity. Propofol introduction led to a significant decrease in cerebral artery velocity (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol but not isoflurane decreased cerebral blood velocity thus restoring cerebral autoregulation and the coupling between cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15949243     DOI: 10.1179/016164105X21724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  7 in total

1.  Early cerebral perfusion pressure augmentation with phenylephrine after traumatic brain injury may be neuroprotective in a pediatric swine model.

Authors:  Stuart H Friess; Colin Smith; Todd J Kilbaugh; Suzanne G Frangos; Jill Ralston; Mark A Helfaer; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  The Role of GABA Receptor Agonists in Anesthesia and Sedation.

Authors:  Janette Brohan; Basavana G Goudra
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Variations of brain endothelial nitric oxide synthase concentration in rat and mouse cortex.

Authors:  R Kenneth Czambel; Alexander Kharlamov; Stephen C Jones
Journal:  Nitric Oxide       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.427

4.  Comparative evaluation of atenolol and clonidine premedication on cardiovascular response to nasal speculum insertion during trans-sphenoid surgery for resection of pituitary adenoma: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled study.

Authors:  Devendra Gupta; Shashi Srivastava; Rajeev K Dubey; Prabhakar S Prakash; Prabhat K Singh; Uttam Singh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03

5.  Confounding factors to predict the awakening effect-site concentration of propofol in target-controlled infusion based on propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.

Authors:  Shun-Ming Chan; Meei-Shyuan Lee; Chueng-He Lu; Chen-Hwan Cherng; Yuan-Shiou Huang; Chun-Chang Yeh; Chan-Yang Kuo; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Monitoring variables affecting positron emission tomography measurements of cerebral blood flow in anaesthetized pigs.

Authors:  Aage Kristian Olsen Alstrup; Nora Elisabeth Zois; Mette Simonsen; Ole Lajord Munk
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Effects of anesthesia and species on the uptake or binding of radioligands in vivo in the Göttingen minipig.

Authors:  Aage K O Alstrup; Anne M Landau; James E Holden; Steen Jakobsen; Anna C Schacht; Helene Audrain; Gregers Wegener; Axel K Hansen; Albert Gjedde; Doris J Doudet
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.