Literature DB >> 15949183

The detection and PCR-based characterization of the parasites causing trypanosomiasis in water-buffalo herds in Venezuela.

H Garcia1, M-E Garcia, H Perez, A Mendoza-Leon.   

Abstract

The usefulness of PCR-based assays for detecting trypanosomiasis in water buffaloes and other livestock was explored, under field conditions, in Venezuela. The sensitivity and specificity of the assays, which were based on established primer pairs (21-mer/22-mer and ILO1264/ILO1265), were evaluated, partly by comparison with the results of parasitological tests (stained bloodsmears and microhaematocrit centrifugation) and immunological assays (IFAT) run in parallel. The optimised PCR-based assays showed a sensitivity of 10 pg DNA. The use of the 21-mer/22-mer primer pair gave a test that was specific for species in the subgenus Trypanozoon (including Trypanosoma evansi), whereas use of ILO1264/ILO1265 produced a test that was specific for T. vivax. The results of a hybridization assay using T. evansi-DNA and T. vivax-DNA probes indicated no cross-hybridization between the T. evansi and T. vivax PCR products.The results of the bloodsmear examinations, microhaematocrit centrifugations (MHC) and IFAT indicated that 23 (6.7%), 39 (11.4%) and 135 (39.5%) of the 342 blood samples investigated (including 316 from water buffaloes) contained trypanosomes, respectively. The results of the PCR-based assays indicated that 68 (19.9%) of the same blood samples contained T. vivax (or at least T. vivax DNA), and that none contained T. evansi or any other member of the subgenus Trypanozoon. For the detection of trypanosomes, the assay therefore appeared almost twice as sensitive as the MHC. These results are the first on the molecular characterization of the trypanosomes infecting water buffaloes in Venezuela. When the results of the MHC (which is the most practical, and frequently used, alternative detection method) were used as the gold standard, the PCR-based assay for T. vivax was found to have 100% sensitivity, 90.4% specificity, a positive predictive value of 0.57, a positive likelihood ratio of 10.45, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.00. The assay therefore appears a reasonable choice for detecting T. vivax in the mammalian livestock of Venezuela and elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15949183     DOI: 10.1179/136485905X36271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol        ISSN: 0003-4983


  7 in total

1.  Molecular diagnosis of cattle trypanosomes in Venezuela: evidences of Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma vivax infections.

Authors:  J R Ramírez-Iglesias; M C Eleizalde; A Reyna-Bello; M Mendoza
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2016-08-22

2.  Genetic diversity among Trypanosoma vivax strains detected in naturally infected cattle in Nigeria based on ITS1 of rDNA and diagnostic antigen gene sequences.

Authors:  Michael I Takeet; Benjamin O Fagbemi; Sunday O Peters; Marcos DeDonato; Abdul-Mojeed Yakubu; Mathew Wheto; Ikhide G Imumorin
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2016-08-13

3.  Variant surface glycoproteins from Venezuelan trypanosome isolates are recognized by sera from animals infected with either Trypanosoma evansi or Trypanosoma vivax.

Authors:  Rocío Camargo; Adriana Izquier; Graciela L Uzcanga; Trina Perrone; Alvaro Acosta-Serrano; Liomary Carrasquel; Laura P Arias; José L Escalona; Vanessa Cardozo; José Bubis
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.738

4.  Field and experimental symptomless infections support wandering donkeys as healthy carriers of Trypanosoma vivax in the Brazilian Semiarid, a region of outbreaks of high mortality in cattle and sheep.

Authors:  Carla M F Rodrigues; Jael S Batista; Joseney M Lima; Francisco J C Freitas; Isabella O Barros; Herakles A Garcia; Adriana C Rodrigues; Erney P Camargo; Marta M G Teixeira
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Trypanosoma evansi and surra: a review and perspectives on origin, history, distribution, taxonomy, morphology, hosts, and pathogenic effects.

Authors:  Marc Desquesnes; Philippe Holzmuller; De-Hua Lai; Alan Dargantes; Zhao-Rong Lun; Sathaporn Jittaplapong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Global distribution, host range and prevalence of Trypanosoma vivax: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eyerusalem Fetene; Samson Leta; Fikru Regassa; Philippe Büscher
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Microsatellite analysis supports clonal propagation and reduced divergence of Trypanosoma vivax from asymptomatic to fatally infected livestock in South America compared to West Africa.

Authors:  Herakles A Garcia; Adriana C Rodrigues; Carla Mf Rodrigues; Zakaria Bengaly; Antonio Hh Minervino; Franklin Riet-Correa; Rosangela Z Machado; Fernando Paiva; Jael S Batista; Luis Neves; Patrick B Hamilton; Marta Mg Teixeira
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 3.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.