BACKGROUND: The association between hypercalciuria and bone mineral density (BMD) has been already recognized. The aim of the present study is to relate BMD to age and sex and to evaluate the calcium metabolism and hypercalciuria-defined dietary or non-dietary category in patients with urolithiasis. METHODS: The BMI of the L2-L4 lumbar vertebrae was measured in 310 renal stone patients (191 men and 119 women). Percent age matched score (%AMS), which is the percent ratio of measured BMD to the mean BMD of age-matched control subjects, was utilized for the appraisal of BMD. Low BMD groups were defined by lower than 90% of %AMS. RESULTS: Low BMD was observed in 27.7% of urinary stone patients, which was not a significant difference to that of control subjects (23.5%) who were measured in the health examination. In male patients with urolithiasis, the frequency of patients in whom BMD had been apt to decrease since youth was high, but there was not a proven significant difference among the three age groups (20-39 years old, 40-59 years old and 60 years old or older). In contrast, for female stone patients, the frequency of low BMD markedly increased in patients aged 40 years or older, when menopause occurs. Furthermore, in female stone patients with hypercalciuria, the frequency of reduced BMD reached more than 40%. When the cause was non-dietary hypercalciuria (classified mainly on the daily amount of urinary calcium excretion after ingestion of calculus test diet), the frequency of reduced BMD reached 65% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In case female stone patients with non-dietary hypercalciuria become menopausal, not only the risk of recurrent lithiasis increases, but the possibility of developing osteopenia in the future also increases. Appropriate treatments for prophylactic effects on urolithiasis or osteopenia should be considered, as judged from BMD, diet, sex, urinary calcium excretion and other factors synthetically.
BACKGROUND: The association between hypercalciuria and bone mineral density (BMD) has been already recognized. The aim of the present study is to relate BMD to age and sex and to evaluate the calcium metabolism and hypercalciuria-defined dietary or non-dietary category in patients with urolithiasis. METHODS: The BMI of the L2-L4 lumbar vertebrae was measured in 310 renal stonepatients (191 men and 119 women). Percent age matched score (%AMS), which is the percent ratio of measured BMD to the mean BMD of age-matched control subjects, was utilized for the appraisal of BMD. Low BMD groups were defined by lower than 90% of %AMS. RESULTS: Low BMD was observed in 27.7% of urinary stone patients, which was not a significant difference to that of control subjects (23.5%) who were measured in the health examination. In male patients with urolithiasis, the frequency of patients in whom BMD had been apt to decrease since youth was high, but there was not a proven significant difference among the three age groups (20-39 years old, 40-59 years old and 60 years old or older). In contrast, for female stone patients, the frequency of low BMD markedly increased in patients aged 40 years or older, when menopause occurs. Furthermore, in female stone patients with hypercalciuria, the frequency of reduced BMD reached more than 40%. When the cause was non-dietary hypercalciuria (classified mainly on the daily amount of urinary calcium excretion after ingestion of calculus test diet), the frequency of reduced BMD reached 65% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In case female stone patients with non-dietary hypercalciuria become menopausal, not only the risk of recurrent lithiasis increases, but the possibility of developing osteopenia in the future also increases. Appropriate treatments for prophylactic effects on urolithiasis or osteopenia should be considered, as judged from BMD, diet, sex, urinary calcium excretion and other factors synthetically.
Authors: Miguel Arrabal-Martin; Antonio Poyatos-Andujar; María del Carmen Cano-García; Miguel Quesada-Charneco; Felix Abad-Menor; María Sierra Girón Prieto; Tomás de Haro Muñoz; Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Brendan Wallace; Linda Lee; Kamaljot S Kaler; Marie Dion; Andrea Cowan; Nabil Sultan; Ben H Chew; Hassan Razvi Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 2.052
Authors: S C Kaste; N A Thomas; S N Rai; K Cheon; E McCammon; R Chesney; D Jones; C-H Pui; M M Hudson Journal: Leukemia Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: P Lucato; C Trevisan; B Stubbs; B M Zanforlini; M Solmi; C Luchini; G Girotti; S Pizzato; E Manzato; G Sergi; S Giannini; M Fusaro; N Veronese Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: María Sierra Girón-Prieto; Salvador Arias-Santiago; María Del Carmen Cano-García; Antonio Poyatos-Andújar; Tomás de Haro-Muñoz; Felix Abad-Menor; Miguel Quesada-Charneco; Miguel Ángel Arrabal-Polo; Miguel Arrabal-Martín Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Prasad L Gawade; Kirsten K Ness; Shelly Sharma; Zhenghong Li; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Sheri L Spunt; Kerri Nottage; Matthew J Krasin; Melissa M Hudson; Sue C Kaste Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 4.442