Literature DB >> 15947471

Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review.

Richard E Goodman1, Susan L Hefle, Steven L Taylor, Ronald van Ree.   

Abstract

The first genetically modified (GM) crops approved for food use (tomato and soybean) were evaluated for safety by the United States Food and Drug Administration prior to commercial production. Among other factors, those products and all additional GM crops that have been grown commercially have been evaluated for potential increases in allergenic properties using methods that are consistent with the current understanding of food allergens and knowledge regarding the prediction of allergenic activity. Although there have been refinements, the key aspects of the evaluation have not changed. The allergenic properties of the gene donor and the host (recipient) organisms are considered in determining the appropriate testing strategy. The amino acid sequence of the encoded protein is compared to all known allergens to determine whether the protein is a known allergen or is sufficiently similar to any known allergen to indicate an increased probability of allergic cross-reactivity. Stability of the protein in the presence of acid with the stomach protease pepsin is tested as a risk factor for food allergenicity. In vitro or in vivo human IgE binding are tested when appropriate, if the gene donor is an allergen or the sequence of the protein is similar to an allergen. Serum donors and skin test subjects are selected based on their proven allergic responses to the gene donor or to material containing the allergen that was matched in sequence. While some scientists and regulators have suggested using animal models, performing broadly targeted serum IgE testing or extensive pre- or post-market clinical tests, current evidence does not support these tests as being predictive or practical. Based on the evidence to date, the current assessment process has worked well to prevent the unintended introduction of allergens in commercial GM crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15947471     DOI: 10.1159/000086314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1018-2438            Impact factor:   2.749


  10 in total

Review 1.  Food safety knowledge on the Bt mutant protein Cry8Ka5 employed in the development of coleopteran-resistant transgenic cotton plants.

Authors:  Davi F Farias; Ad A C M Peijnenburg; Maria F Grossi-de-Sá; Ana F U Carvalho
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.269

2.  Development of a novel transgenic rice with hypocholesterolemic activity via high-level accumulation of the α' subunit of soybean β-conglycinin.

Authors:  Cerrone Cabanos; Naoki Kato; Yoshiki Amari; Keigo Fujiwara; Tomoki Ohno; Kousuke Shimizu; Tsuyoshi Goto; Masaya Shimada; Masaharu Kuroda; Taro Masuda; Fumio Takaiwa; Shigeru Utsumi; Satoshi Nagaoka; Nobuyuki Maruyama
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Suggested improvements for the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants used in foods.

Authors:  Richard E Goodman; Afua O Tetteh
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Digestion assays in allergenicity assessment of transgenic proteins.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; Nicholas P Storer; Yong Gao
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Computational detection of allergenic proteins attains a new level of accuracy with in silico variable-length peptide extraction and machine learning.

Authors:  D Soeria-Atmadja; T Lundell; M G Gustafsson; U Hammerling
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  AlgPred: prediction of allergenic proteins and mapping of IgE epitopes.

Authors:  Sudipto Saha; G P S Raghava
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops.

Authors:  Michael S Koch; Jason M Ward; Steven L Levine; James A Baum; John L Vicini; Bruce G Hammond
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  The COMPARE Database: A Public Resource for Allergen Identification, Adapted for Continuous Improvement.

Authors:  Ronald van Ree; Dexter Sapiter Ballerda; M Cecilia Berin; Laurent Beuf; Alexander Chang; Gabriele Gadermaier; Paul A Guevera; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Emir Islamovic; Liisa Koski; John Kough; Gregory S Ladics; Scott McClain; Kyle A McKillop; Shermaine Mitchell-Ryan; Clare A Narrod; Lucilia Pereira Mouriès; Syril Pettit; Lars K Poulsen; Andre Silvanovich; Ping Song; Suzanne S Teuber; Christal Bowman
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2021-08-06

9.  The value of position-specific scoring matrices for assessment of protein allegenicity.

Authors:  Shen Jean Lim; Joo Chuan Tong; Fook Tim Chew; Martti T Tammi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  AllerHunter: a SVM-pairwise system for assessment of allergenicity and allergic cross-reactivity in proteins.

Authors:  Hon Cheng Muh; Joo Chuan Tong; Martti T Tammi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.