Literature DB >> 1594736

Estimating the probability of spontaneous abortion in the presence of induced abortion and vice versa.

C R Hammerslough1.   

Abstract

An integrated approach to estimate the total number of pregnancies that begin in a population during one calendar year and the probability of spontaneous abortion is described. This includes an indirect estimate of the number of pregnancies that result in spontaneous abortions. The method simultaneously takes into account the proportion of induced abortions that are censored by spontaneous abortions and vice versa in order to estimate the true annual number of spontaneous and induced abortions for a population. It also estimates the proportion of pregnancies that women intended to allow to continue to a live birth. The proposed indirect approach derives adjustment factors to make indirect estimates by combining vital statistics information on gestational age at induced abortion (from the 12 States that report to the National Center for Health Statistics) with a life table of spontaneous abortion probabilities. The adjustment factors are applied to data on induced abortions from the Alan Guttmacher Institute Abortion Provider Survey and data on births from U.S. vital statistics. For the United States in 1980 the probability of a spontaneous abortion is 19 percent, given the presence of induced abortion. Once the effects of spontaneous abortion are discounted, women in 1980 intended to allow 73 percent of their pregnancies to proceed to a live birth. One medical benefit to a population practicing induced abortion is that induced abortions avert some spontaneous abortions, leading to a lower mean gestational duration at the time of spontaneous abortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1594736      PMCID: PMC1403646     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  11 in total

1.  A life table of pregnancy terminations and correlates of fetal loss.

Authors:  S SHAPIRO; E W JONES; P M DENSEN
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1962-01

2.  Probabilities of fetal mortality.

Authors:  F E FRENCH; J M BIERMAN
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Competition between spontaneous and induced abortion.

Authors:  R G Potter
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1975-02

4.  Estimates of pregnancies and pregnancy rates for the United States, 1976-85.

Authors:  S J Ventura; S M Taffel; W D Mosher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Correcting spontaneous abortion rates for the presence of induced abortion.

Authors:  I Figa'-Talamanca; F Repetto
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A portrait of American women who obtain abortions.

Authors:  S K Henshaw; N J Binkin; E Blaine; J C Smith
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr

7.  Fetal wastage in eleven Punjab villages.

Authors:  R G Potter; J B Wyon; M New; J E Gordon
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  Spontaneous abortion and induced abortion: an adjustment for the presence of induced abortion when estimating the rate of spontaneous abortion from cross-sectional studies.

Authors:  E Susser
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Abortions preventable by contraceptive practice.

Authors:  C F Westoff; J S DeLung; N Goldman; J D Forrest
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct

10.  Incidence of early loss of pregnancy.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; C R Weinberg; J F O'Connor; D D Baird; J P Schlatterer; R E Canfield; E G Armstrong; B C Nisula
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-07-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantifying the number of pregnancies at risk of malaria in 2007: a demographic study.

Authors:  Stephanie Dellicour; Andrew J Tatem; Carlos A Guerra; Robert W Snow; Feiko O ter Kuile
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  Estimating the contribution of a service delivery organisation to the national modern contraceptive prevalence rate: Marie Stopes International's Impact 2 model.

Authors:  Michelle B Weinberger; Kenzo Fry; Tania Boler; Kristen Hopkins
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support.

Authors:  Mona Y Alqassim; K Cassie Kresnye; Katie A Siek; John Lee; Maria K Wolters
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.