Literature DB >> 15947335

Treatment preferences for resuscitation and critical care among homeless persons.

Wendi M Norris1, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Homeless people are at increased risk of critical illness and are less likely to have surrogate decision makers when critically ill. Consequently, clinicians must make decisions independently or with input from others such as ethics committees or guardians. No prior studies have examined treatment preferences of homeless to guide such decision makers.
DESIGN: Interviewer-administered, cross-sectional survey of homeless persons.
SETTING: Homeless shelters in Seattle, WA. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty-nine homeless individuals with two comparison groups: 236 physicians practicing in settings where they are likely to provide care for homeless persons and 111 patients with oxygen-dependent COPD. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were asked whether they would want intubation with mechanical ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation in their current health, if they were in a permanent coma, if they had severe dementia, or if they were confined to bed and dependent on others for all care.
RESULTS: Homeless men were more likely to want resuscitation than homeless women (p < 0.002) in coma and dementia scenarios. Homeless men and women were both more likely to want resuscitation in these scenarios than physicians (p < 0.001). Nonwhite homeless were more likely to want resuscitation than white homeless people (p < 0.033), and both were more likely to want resuscitation than physicians (p < 0.001). Homeless are also more likely to want resuscitation than patients with COPD. The majority (80%) of homeless who reported not having family or not wanting family to make medical decisions prefer a physician make decisions rather than a court-appointed guardian.
CONCLUSIONS: Homeless persons are more likely to prefer resuscitation than physicians and patients with severe COPD. Since physicians may be in the position of making medical decisions for homeless patients and since physicians are influenced by their own preferences when making decisions for others, physicians should be aware that, on average, homeless persons prefer more aggressive care than physicians. Hospitals serving homeless individuals should consider developing policies to address this issue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15947335     DOI: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  18 in total

1.  Examining the root cause of surrogate conflicts in the intensive care unit and general wards.

Authors:  Allison Neyhart Rubin; Katrina A Bramstedt
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2010-03

2.  Ethical Concerns and Procedural Pathways for Patients Who are Incapacitated and Alone: Implications from a Qualitative Study for Advancing Ethical Practice.

Authors:  Jennifer Moye; Casey Catlin; Jennifer Kwak; Erica Wood; Pamela B Teaster
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  Critical illness in homeless persons is poorly studied: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Clarence Chant; Alyssa Wang; Karen E A Burns; Claudia C dos Santos; Stephen W Hwang; Jan O Friedrich; Orla M Smith
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Predictors of time to death after terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in the ICU.

Authors:  Colin R Cooke; David L Hotchkin; Ruth A Engelberg; Lewis Rubinson; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Ethical and Legal Considerations in the Management of an Unbefriended Patient in a Vegetative State.

Authors:  Alexandra Lloyd-Smith Sequeira; Ariane Lewis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  The Community Perspective on Potentially Inappropriate Treatment.

Authors:  Thanh H Neville; Derjung M Tarn; Carol L Pavlish; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-07

7.  Life-sustaining treatment preferences: matches and mismatches between patients' preferences and clinicians' perceptions.

Authors:  Lois Downey; David H Au; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  The Effect of Advance Directive Completion on Hospital Care Among Chronically Homeless Persons: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alexander K Leung; Matthew J To; Linh Luong; Zahra Syavash Vahabi; Victor L Gonçalves; John Song; Stephen W Hwang
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 9.  [Interdisciplinary emergency room - key to success?].

Authors:  M Kirsch; P Zahn; D Happel; A Gries
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  Erin K Kross; Ruth A Engelberg; Sarah E Shannon; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.