Literature DB >> 15946979

Computed tomography and 18F-FDG positron emission tomography for therapy control of Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: when do we really need FDG-PET?

M J Reinhardt1, C Herkel, C Altehoefer, J Finke, E Moser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and [(18)F]fluoro-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for prediction of progression-free survival of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients after completion of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CT and FDG-PET were performed in 40 HD, 17 indolent NHL and 44 aggressive NHL patients (29 women, 72 men; aged 41+/-14 years) in a median of 2 months after therapy. Progression-free survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors were identified by means of Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: CT imaging results were progressive disease (PD) in five, stable disease (SD) in 57, and partial response (PR) or complete remission (CR) in 39 patients. FDG-PET suggested residual lymphoma in 24 patients. Three-year progression-free survival rates after exclusion of five PD patients were: 100% (PET negative; CT: PR or CR), 81% (PET negative; CT: SD), 21% (PET positive; CT: SD) and 0% (PET positive; CT: PR). FDG-PET (P<0.0001) and bulky disease (P <0.05) were identified as independent prognostic variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Among lymphoma patients with PR and SD on CT, FDG-PET discriminated those destined to progress into a low risk of < or =20% and a high risk for recurrence of > or =80%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15946979     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  19 in total

1.  The evolving role of F-FDG PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Peter J Hosein; Izidore S Lossos
Journal:  European J Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2010-02

2.  18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric lymphoma: comparison with conventional imaging.

Authors:  Kevin London; Siobhan Cross; Ella Onikul; Luciano Dalla-Pozza; Robert Howman-Giles
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Methodological issues in the evaluation of FDG PET/CT accuracy in pediatric lymphoma.

Authors:  Kevin London; Robert Howman-Giles
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Assessment of the nature of residual masses at end of treatment in lymphoma patients using volume perfusion computed tomography.

Authors:  R Syha; L Grünwald; T Horger; D Spira; D Ketelsen; W Vogel; C D Claussen; M Horger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  FDG PET in response evaluation of bulky masses in paediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients enrolled in the Italian AIEOP-LH2004 trial.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Maurizio Mascarin; Arnoldo Piccardo; Angelo Castello; Caterina Elia; Luca Guerra; Eugenio Borsatti; Alessandra Sala; Alessandra Todesco; Pietro Zucchetta; Piero Farruggia; Angelina Cistaro; Salvatore Buffardi; Patrizia Bertolini; Maurizio Bianchi; Maria Luisa Moleti; Feisal Bunkheila; Paolo Indolfi; Franca Fagioli; Alberto Garaventa; Roberta Burnelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Haematological cancer: Staging and restaging patients with lymphoma - a better approach?

Authors:  Vijaya R Bhatt; James O Armitage
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas.

Authors:  N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Gastric and pulmonary lymphoma presenting as a solitary pulmonary nodule.

Authors:  El Thomas; Np Lenzo; R Troedson
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-10-01

9.  Current status of PET/CT in the diagnosis and follow up of lymphomas.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011

Review 10.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.