UNLABELLED: The present study sought to validate the concept of C2 monitoring in 41 de-novo transplant patients treated with microemulsion ofcyclosporine, mycophenolatesodium, steroids and basiliximab. RESULTS: After 6 months patient and graft survival was 98%, rejection rate was 19%. In the first week only a few patients achieved the suggested C2 levels (19% > 1500, 50% > 1200 ng/ml) despite an increased cyclosporine (CsA) dose. After 14 days 63% of patients reached C2 > 1500 ng/ml (83% C2 > 1200) despite decreased CsA dose. 35% of patients had intermittent high C0 (> 300) and low C2 (< 800), suggesting poor and/or slow absorption. Most of them suffered from CsA toxicity. There was a significant (p < 0.05) change of absorption as measured by C2/C0 leading to an increase of C2/dose. CONCLUSIONS: C2 monitoring may be useful to better estimate the CsA exposure in individual patients; however our results indicate some limitations of the current concept of C2 monitoring. Despite increase of dosage many patients do not reach the proposed levels. A significant proportion of patients are poor and/or slow absorbers. CsA toxicity may not be detected by C2 monitoring alone. With the use of basiliximab and mycophenolatesodium lower target levels seem to be sufficient.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: The present study sought to validate the concept of C2 monitoring in 41 de-novo transplant patients treated with microemulsion of cyclosporine, mycophenolatesodium, steroids and basiliximab. RESULTS: After 6 months patient and graft survival was 98%, rejection rate was 19%. In the first week only a few patients achieved the suggested C2 levels (19% > 1500, 50% > 1200 ng/ml) despite an increased cyclosporine (CsA) dose. After 14 days 63% of patients reached C2 > 1500 ng/ml (83% C2 > 1200) despite decreased CsA dose. 35% of patients had intermittent high C0 (> 300) and low C2 (< 800), suggesting poor and/or slow absorption. Most of them suffered from CsAtoxicity. There was a significant (p < 0.05) change of absorption as measured by C2/C0 leading to an increase of C2/dose. CONCLUSIONS: C2 monitoring may be useful to better estimate the CsA exposure in individual patients; however our results indicate some limitations of the current concept of C2 monitoring. Despite increase of dosage many patients do not reach the proposed levels. A significant proportion of patients are poor and/or slow absorbers. CsAtoxicity may not be detected by C2 monitoring alone. With the use of basiliximab and mycophenolatesodium lower target levels seem to be sufficient.