Literature DB >> 15945442

Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note.

Ko Ikuta1, Junichi Arima, Takayuki Tanaka, Masayoshi Oga, Soichiro Nakano, Kosuke Sasaki, Kohei Goshi, Masaki Yo, Shingo Fukagawa.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors applied the technique of microendoscopic discectomy to posterior decompression procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using an endoscopic technique to treat lumbar spinal stenosis and to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of microendoscopic posterior decompression (MEPD).
METHODS: Microendoscopic posterior decompression, which involves a unilateral endoscopic approach for bilateral decompression, was performed in 47 patients. Clinical and radiographic/neuroimaging results were evaluated during the follow-up period (minimum duration 1 year). The clinical results were compared with those of the conventional laminotomy. Radiographic instability and the degree of surgical invasion of the facet joints were evaluated. In a control a group of 29 patients open laminotomy was performed. The clinical outcome was evaluated in 44 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 22 months. The mean rate of improvement was 72% based on the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and good results were obtained in 38 patients. Although the rate of morbidity decreased in the MEPD group, the incidence of complication was slightly higher. Effective decompression was demonstrated in the majority of the patients by using magnetic resonance imaging. Radiographic instability appeared in one patient postoperatively, and based on computerized tomography scanning, a tendency toward invasion of the facet joint on the approach side was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Microendoscopic posterior decompression is a minimally invasive procedure and is as useful as other conventional procedures in treating lumbar spinal stenosis; however, a few technical problems remain to be solved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15945442     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.5.0624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  22 in total

1.  Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a technical note.

Authors:  Yasuo Mikami; Masateru Nagae; Takumi Ikeda; Hitoshi Tonomura; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Development of percutaneously insertable/removable interspinous process spacer for treatment of posture-dependent lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: preclinical feasibility study using porcine model.

Authors:  Kotaro Nishida; Minoru Doita; Kenichiro Kakutani; Koichiro Maeno; Takashi Yurube; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; M Schneider; B Marquardt; U Liljenqvist; T A Pietilä; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Less invasive and less technically demanding decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis--appropriate for general orthopaedic surgeons?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Takamitsu Okada; Kensuke Fukushima; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Hiroyuki Sakagami; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Toshiaki Kotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of Microendoscopic Laminotomy (MEL) Versus Spinous Process-Splitting Laminotomy (SPSL) for Multi Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Ryunosuke Oyama; Takeshi Arizono; Akihiko Inokuchi; Ryuta Imamura; Takahiro Hamada; Hirofumi Bekki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-09

6.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Wein-Chin Chen; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Yamada; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Kazuhiro Maio; Masaki Kawai; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Bilateral Decompression via Microscopic TubularCrossing Laminotomy (MTCL) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Early Surgical Result.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Jin-Sung Kim; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Woo Hur
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results.

Authors:  Albert P Wong; Zachary A Smith; Rohan R Lall; Lacey E Bresnahan; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.