Literature DB >> 15945042

Think of a number... any number?

David K Whynes1, Zoë Philips, Emma Frew.   

Abstract

An examination of the willingness to pay values elicited from more than 3000 persons involved in three independent studies revealed that the majority had offered one of a limited number of values from the ranges available to them. These values were 'prominent numbers', the use of which has been observed previously in circumstances where subjects feel that precise estimates of value are either difficult to make, or are not worth making. The existence of widespread prominence in response is suggestive of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15945042     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  4 in total

1.  Patients' willingness to pay for electronic communication with their general practitioner.

Authors:  Trine Strand Bergmo; Silje Camilla Wangberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2006-12-21

2.  Stubbing out hypothetical bias: improving tobacco market predictions by combining stated and revealed preference data.

Authors:  John Buckell; Stephane Hess
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Validity of Willingness to Pay Measures under Preference Uncertainty.

Authors:  Carola Braun; Katrin Rehdanz; Ulrich Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Longitudinal changes and determinants of parental willingness to pay for the prevention of childhood overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Romy Lauer; Meike Traub; Sylvia Hansen; Reinhold Kilian; Jürgen Michael Steinacker; Dorothea Kesztyüs
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2020-05-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.