Literature DB >> 15945041

Pharmaceutical promotion and GP prescription behaviour.

Frank Windmeijer1, Eric de Laat, Rudy Douven, Esther Mot.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to empirically analyse the responses by general practitioners to promotional activities for ethical drugs by pharmaceutical companies. Promotion can be beneficial as a means of providing information, but it can also be harmful in the sense that it lowers price sensitivity of doctors and it merely is a means of maintaining market share, even when cheaper, therapeutically equivalent drugs are available. A model is estimated that includes interactions of promotion expenditures and prices and that explicitly exploits the panel structure of the data, allowing for drug specific effects and dynamic adjustments, or habit persistence. The data used are aggregate monthly GP prescriptions per drug together with monthly outlays on drug promotion for the period 1994-1999 for 11 therapeutic markets, covering more than half of the total prescription drug market in the Netherlands. Identification of price effects is aided by the introduction of the Pharmaceutical Prices Act, which established that Dutch drugs prices became a weighted average of the prices in surrounding countries after June 1996. We conclude that GP drug price sensitivity is small, but adversely affected by promotion. Ltd. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15945041     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  14 in total

1.  Using price-volume agreements to manage pharmaceutical leakage and off-label promotion.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-09-06

2.  What patients think about promotional activities of pharmaceutical companies in Turkey.

Authors:  Semih Semin; Dilek Güldal; Nilgün Ozçakar; Vildan Mevsim
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-10-26

3.  Receipt of Promotional Payments at the Individual and Physician Network Level Associated with Higher Branded Antipsychotic Prescribing Rates.

Authors:  Simon Hollands
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-01

Review 4.  Information from pharmaceutical companies and the quality, quantity, and cost of physicians' prescribing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Spurling; Peter R Mansfield; Brett D Montgomery; Joel Lexchin; Jenny Doust; Noordin Othman; Agnes I Vitry
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Antibiotic prescriptions in primary health care in a rural population in Crete, Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontarakis; Ioanna G Tsiligianni; Polyvios Papadokostakis; Evangelia Giannopoulou; Loukas Tsironis; Vasilios Moustakis
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-02-15

6.  Pricing appraisal of anti-cancer drugs in the South East Asian, Western Pacific and East Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  Shahrzad Salmasi; Kah Seng Lee; Long Chiau Ming; Chin Fen Neoh; Mahmoud E Elrggal; Zaheer-Ud- Din Babar; Tahir Mehmood Khan; Muhammad Abdul Hadi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Higher pharmaceutical public expenditure after direct price control: improved access or induced demand? The Colombian case.

Authors:  Sergio I Prada; Victoria E Soto; Tatiana S Andia; Claudia P Vaca; Álvaro A Morales; Sergio R Márquez; Alejandro Gaviria
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2018-03-02

8.  Impact of external price referencing on medicine prices - a price comparison among 14 European countries.

Authors:  Christine Leopold; Aukje Katja Mantel-Teeuwisse; Leonhard Seyfang; Sabine Vogler; Kees de Joncheere; Richard Ogilvie Laing; Hubert Leufkens
Journal:  South Med Rev       Date:  2012-12-27

9.  Association between industry payments and prescribing costly medications: an observational study using open payments and medicare part D data.

Authors:  Manvi Sharma; Aisha Vadhariya; Michael L Johnson; Zachary A Marcum; Holly M Holmes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Unpacking the effects of adverse regulatory events: Evidence from pharmaceutical relabeling.

Authors:  Matthew J Higgins; Xin Yan; Chirantan Chatterjee
Journal:  Res Policy       Date:  2020-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.