Literature DB >> 15943958

Medication Quantification Scale Version III: update in medication classes and revised detriment weights by survey of American Pain Society Physicians.

R Norman Harden1, Stephan R Weinland, Thomas A Remble, Timothy T Houle, Sean Colio, Susan Steedman, William G Kee.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) is an instrument with potential clinical and research applications for quantifying medication regimen use in chronic pain populations. The MQS was developed in 1992 and updated in 1998 (MQS II) as a tool to co-quantify 3 relevant aspects of medications prescribed for chronic nonmalignant pain: drug class, dosage, and detriment (risk). This 2003 version (MQS III) is the third iteration of the scale, featuring new detriment weights determined by surveying all physician members of the American Pain Society in the United States via mail. A total of 248 physicians (18%) responded with their opinion as to the detriment of 22 mechanistically distinct medication classes. Overall, the physician ratings of detriment weight were relatively consistent (alpha = .84). The increased number of survey responses encompassed a wide range of disciplines, thus reducing discipline bias and introducing several important changes to MQS scoring. Some medication classes previously rated with low detriment weights (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) increased in detriment weight (from 2 to 3.4), whereas other classes previously given high weights (eg, "strong" opioids) received lower detriment ratings (from 5 to 3.4) in this survey. The MQS III must now be validated in clinical and research applications. PERSPECTIVE: The MQS is a tool to objectively quantify pain. It computes a single numeric value for a patient's pain medication profile. This number can be used by both clinicians and researchers to track pain levels through a treatment course or research study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943958     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  45 in total

1.  The cortical rhythms of chronic back pain.

Authors:  Marwan N Baliki; Alex T Baria; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Pain characteristic differences between subacute and chronic back pain.

Authors:  Mona Lisa Chanda; Matthew D Alvin; Thomas J Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  P Hadji; J R Zanchetta; L Russo; C P Recknor; K G Saag; F E McKiernan; S L Silverman; J Alam; R T Burge; J H Krege; M C Lakshmanan; D N Masica; B H Mitlak; J L Stock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A Novel Modality for Facet Joint Denervation: Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation for Lumbar Facet Syndrome. A Case Series.

Authors:  Zachary L McCormick; Jeremy Walker; Benjamin Marshall; Robert McCarthy; David R Walega
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Int       Date:  2014

5.  Contribution of cancer symptoms, dysfunctional sleep related thoughts, and sleep inhibitory behaviors to the insomnia process in breast cancer survivors: a daily process analysis.

Authors:  Meredith E Rumble; Francis J Keefe; Jack D Edinger; Glenn Affleck; P Kelly Marcom; Heather S Shaw
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  The Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire: A Tool to Capture Patient-Reported Chronic Pain Medication Use.

Authors:  Jessica Robinson-Papp; Mary Catherine George; Arada Wongmek; Alexandra Nmashie; Jessica S Merlin; Yousaf Ali; Lawrence Epstein; Mark Green; Stelian Serban; Parag Sheth; David M Simpson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Major depressive disorder and sleep disturbance in patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Patricia C Emery; Keith G Wilson; John Kowal
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Factors affecting hospital staff judgments about sickle cell disease pain.

Authors:  James Elander; Malgorzata Marczewska; Roger Amos; Aldine Thomas; Sekayi Tangayi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-02-22

9.  Transforaminal versus intra-articular facet corticosteroid injections for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

Authors:  N J Bureau; T Moser; J H Dagher; D Shedid; M Li; P Brassard; B E Leduc
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The brain in chronic CRPS pain: abnormal gray-white matter interactions in emotional and autonomic regions.

Authors:  Paul Y Geha; Marwan N Baliki; R Norman Harden; William R Bauer; Todd B Parrish; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.