BACKGROUND: Serum pancreatic lipase may improve the diagnosis of pancreatitis compared to serum amylase. Both enzymes have been measured simultaneously at our hospital allowing for a comparison of their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Seventeen thousand five hundred and thirty-one measurements of either serum amylase and or serum pancreatic lipase were made on 10 931 patients treated at a metropolitan teaching hospital between January 2001 and May 2003. Of these, 8937 were initially treated in the Emergency Department. These results were collected in a database, which was linked by the patients' medical record number to the radiology and medical records. Patients with either an elevated lipase value or a discharge diagnosis of acute pancreatitis had their radiological diagnosis reviewed along with their biochemistry and histology record. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was made if there was radiological evidence of peripancreatic inflammation. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred and twenty-five patients had either elevated serum amylase and or serum pancreatic lipase. The medical records coded for pancreatitis in a further 55 whose enzymes were not elevated. Three hundred and twenty of these had radiological evidence of acute pancreatitis. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of the initial sample from patients received in the Emergency Department showed improved diagnostic accuracy for serum pancreatic lipase (area under the curve (AUC) 0.948) compared with serum amylase (AUC, 0.906, P < 0.05). A clinically useful cut-off point would be at the diagnostic threshold; 208 U/L (normal <190 U/L) for serum pancreatic lipase and 114 U/L (normal 27-100 U/L) for serum amylase where the sensitivity was 90.3 cf., 76.8% and the specificity was 93 cf., 92.6%. 18.8% of the acute pancreatitis patients did not have elevated serum amylase while only 2.9% did not have elevated serum pancreatic lipase on the first emergency department measurement. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that serum pancreatic lipase is a more accurate biomarker of acute pancreatitis than serum amylase.
BACKGROUND: Serum pancreatic lipase may improve the diagnosis of pancreatitis compared to serum amylase. Both enzymes have been measured simultaneously at our hospital allowing for a comparison of their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Seventeen thousand five hundred and thirty-one measurements of either serum amylase and or serum pancreatic lipase were made on 10 931 patients treated at a metropolitan teaching hospital between January 2001 and May 2003. Of these, 8937 were initially treated in the Emergency Department. These results were collected in a database, which was linked by the patients' medical record number to the radiology and medical records. Patients with either an elevated lipase value or a discharge diagnosis of acute pancreatitis had their radiological diagnosis reviewed along with their biochemistry and histology record. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was made if there was radiological evidence of peripancreatic inflammation. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred and twenty-five patients had either elevated serum amylase and or serum pancreatic lipase. The medical records coded for pancreatitis in a further 55 whose enzymes were not elevated. Three hundred and twenty of these had radiological evidence of acute pancreatitis. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of the initial sample from patients received in the Emergency Department showed improved diagnostic accuracy for serum pancreatic lipase (area under the curve (AUC) 0.948) compared with serum amylase (AUC, 0.906, P < 0.05). A clinically useful cut-off point would be at the diagnostic threshold; 208 U/L (normal <190 U/L) for serum pancreatic lipase and 114 U/L (normal 27-100 U/L) for serum amylase where the sensitivity was 90.3 cf., 76.8% and the specificity was 93 cf., 92.6%. 18.8% of the acute pancreatitispatients did not have elevated serum amylase while only 2.9% did not have elevated serum pancreatic lipase on the first emergency department measurement. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that serum pancreatic lipase is a more accurate biomarker of acute pancreatitis than serum amylase.
Authors: Jacob P Ritter; Federico M Ghirimoldi; Laura S M Manuel; Eric E Moffett; Thomas J Novicki; James C McClay; Paula K Shireman; Bradley B Brimhall Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Shalini Makawita; Chris Smith; Ihor Batruch; Yingye Zheng; Felix Rückert; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Steven Gallinger; Eleftherios P Diamandis Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Paul A Sutton; David J Humes; Gemma Purcell; Janette K Smith; Frances Whiting; Tom Wright; Linda Morgan; Dileep N Lobo Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Bum Su Choung; Seong Hun Kim; Seung Young Seo; In Hee Kim; Sang Wook Kim; Seung-Ok Lee; Soo Teik Lee Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 3.199