Literature DB >> 15943689

Subjective and objective probability effects on P300 amplitude revisited.

J Peter Rosenfeld1, Julianne R Biroschak, Melissa J Kleschen, Kyle M Smith.   

Abstract

Does objective probability affect P300 size independently and in addition to subjective probability? The latter was manipulated by the number of stimuli presented and classification task. Five groups saw target and frequent stimuli. Two saw these with p=.2 or .067, with two different button presses. Three groups saw two additional nontarget stimuli each with p=.067. One group pressed a different button for each stimulus. A second group pressed one button for the three oddballs, another for the frequent. A third critical group pressed one button for the target and another for other stimuli. In this group, P300 was larger for targets versus nontargets, and larger for nontargets versus frequents. Although nontargets were classified with frequents, their actual low probability distinguished them from frequents, and their subjective probability distinguished them from targets. Therefore, actual and subjective probability effects were independently found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943689     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00283.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  8 in total

1.  Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures.

Authors:  José A Hinojosa; Luis Carretié; María A Valcárcel; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Miguel A Pozo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Objective measurement of visual resolution using the P300 to self-facial images.

Authors:  David J Marhöfer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Faces are more attractive than motion: evidence from two simultaneous oddball paradigms.

Authors:  David J Marhöfer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm.

Authors:  Michael Niedeggen; Natia Sarauli; Santi Cacciola; Sarah Weschke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Target and Non-Target Processing during Oddball and Cyberball: A Comparative Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Sarah Weschke; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Application of the P300 Event-Related Potential in the Diagnosis of Epilepsy Disorder: A Review.

Authors:  Kandhasamy Sowndhararajan; Minju Kim; Ponnuvel Deepa; Se Jin Park; Songmun Kim
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2018-03-26

8.  Loss of control as a violation of expectations: Testing the predictions of a common inconsistency compensation approach in an inclusionary cyberball game.

Authors:  Michael Niedeggen; Rudolf Kerschreiter; Katharina Schuck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.