Literature DB >> 15943673

When good things go bad: the reflex physiology of defense.

Margaret M Bradley1, Brad Moulder, Peter J Lang.   

Abstract

For humans, the threat of painful shock greatly potentiates the reflexive startle blink. Moreover, viewing unpleasant, compared with pleasant, pictures also prompts heightened startle reflexes, suggesting that the startle reflex indexes general defensive activation. In this study, pleasant or unpleasant pictures were used to signal shock threat in order to explore how previous affective associations modulate new defensive reactions. When cuing threat of shock, pleasant and unpleasant pictures prompted physiological profiles consistent with defensive activation, indicating that threat of shock renders previously pleasant cues aversive. For unpleasant pictures only, defensive startle was potentiated even when these cues signaled safety. Taken together, the data indicate that (a) regardless of their intrinsic affective meaning, cues signaling shock threat prompt somatic and autonomic reactions consistent with defense, and that (b) intrinsically unpleasant cues continue to prompt defensive activation even when the context of their presentation is specifically non-threatening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943673     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01558.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  38 in total

1.  Sustained and transient modulation of performance induced by emotional picture viewing.

Authors:  Mirtes Garcia Pereira; Eliane Volchan; Gabriela Guerra Leal de Souza; Leticia Oliveira; Rafaela Ramos Campagnoli; Walter Machado Pinheiro; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-11

2.  Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes.

Authors:  Pammi V S Chandrasekhar; C Monica Capra; Sara Moore; Charles Noussair; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Emotion regulation and potentiated startle across affective picture and threat-of-shock paradigms.

Authors:  Shmuel Lissek; Kaebah Orme; Dana J McDowell; Linda L Johnson; David A Luckenbaugh; Johanna M Baas; Brian R Cornwell; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 4.  The anxiety disorder spectrum: fear imagery, physiological reactivity, and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Peter J Lang; Lisa M McTeague
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2009-01

5.  Psychometric properties of startle and corrugator response in NPU, affective picture viewing, and resting state tasks.

Authors:  Jesse T Kaye; Daniel E Bradford; John J Curtin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Pictures cueing threat: brain dynamics in viewing explicitly instructed danger cues.

Authors:  Florian Bublatzky; Harald T Schupp
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals.

Authors:  Jaroslaw M Michalowski; Christiane A Pané-Farré; Andreas Löw; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Emotional attention modulates microsaccadic rate and direction.

Authors:  Koji Kashihara; Kazuo Okanoya; Nobuyuki Kawai
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: an ideomotor approach.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; Klaus Rothermund; Jan De Houwer; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-25

10.  Moderators of and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults' memory performance.

Authors:  Thomas M Hess; Joey T Hinson; Elizabeth A Hodges
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.