Literature DB >> 15943510

Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria.

Stephen F Stanziale1, Mark H Wholey, Tamer N Boules, Faith Selzer, Michel S Makaroun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop customized duplex ultrasound criteria for assessment of in-stent restenosis in the carotid arteries.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 605 patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) from July 1996 to August 2004 at a single institution. Data on the stented carotid artery were accumulated from patients who had carotid angiography and duplex ultrasound (US) within 30 days of each other. Preliminary review found 118 pairs of ultrasound scans and angiograms in stented carotid arteries. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and internal carotid artery to common carotid artery ratio (ICA/CCA) were examined. Angiographic stenosis was graded by NASCET criteria and compared to velocity parameters at clinically relevant levels of stenosis. The Student t test was used to compare similarly obtained data from 41 nonstented carotid arteries.
RESULTS: PSV, ICA/CCA ratio, and EDV increased to a greater degree in stented arteries with stenosis. In 50% to 69% stenotic arteries, mean ICA/CCA ratio was 4.74+/-0.61 in stented versus 3.68+/-0.24 in nonstented carotid arteries (p = 0.043). In arteries with > or = 70% stenosis, there were increases in PSV (475+/-22 versus 337+/-26 cm/s, p = 0.001), EDV (172+/-23 versus 122+/-8 cm/s, p = 0.043), and the ICA/CCA ratio (8.18+/-2.19 versus 5.11+/-0.66, p = 0.063) in stented versus nonstented arteries, respectively. To detect > or = 70% angiographic stenosis, PSV > or = 350 cm/s had 100% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 55% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predictive value (NPV); an ICA/CCA ratio > or = 4.75 had 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 50% PPV, and 100% NPV. To predict > 50% stenosis, combining PSV > or = 225 cm/s and ICA/PCA ratio > or = 2.5 increased sensitivity (95%), specificity (99%), PPV (95%), NPV (99%), and accuracy (98%).
CONCLUSIONS: PSV and ICA/CCA increase with stenosis to a greater extent in stented carotid arteries, necessitating revision of existing US criteria to follow CAS patients. To determine > or = 70% in-stent stenosis, PSV > or = 350 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio > or = 4.75 are sensitive criteria. To determine > or = 50% stenosis, combining PSV > or = 225 cm/s and ICA/PCA ratio > or = 2.5 is optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943510     DOI: 10.1583/04-1527.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  16 in total

1.  Carotid artery interventions for restenosis after prior stenting: is it different from interventions of de novo lesions? Results from the carotid artery stent (CAS)--registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

Authors:  Ralf Zahn; Thomas Ischinger; Uwe Zeymer; Johannes Brachmann; Jens Jung; Hartwig Haase; Karl Eugen Hauptmann; Hubert Seggewiss; Ilse Janicke; Matthias Leschke; Harald Mudra
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Prediction of cardiovascular events by inflammatory markers in patients undergoing carotid stenting.

Authors:  Francesco Versaci; Bernhard Reimers; Francesco Prati; Achille Gaspardone; Costantino Del Giudice; Andrea Pacchioni; Alessandro Mauriello; Claudio Cortese; Paolo Nardi; Anna De Fazio; Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello; Igino Proietti; Luigi Chiariello
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  The incidence of carotid in-stent stenosis is underestimated ≥50% or ≥80% and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Zachary T AbuRahma; Grant Scott; Elliot Adams; Abe Mata; Matthew Beasley; L Scott Dean; Elaine Davis
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Comparison of Restenosis Risk in Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Carotid Stents: A Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation.

Authors:  Ján Sýkora; Kamil Zeleňák; Martin Vorčák; Martin Števík; Martina Sýkorová; Jozef Sivák; Marek Rovňák; Jana Zapletalová; Juraj Mužík; Igor Šinák; Egon Kurča; Lukas Meyer; Jens Fiehler
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries in the international carotid stenting study.

Authors:  Floris Tm Bosch; Jeroen Hendrikse; Indran Davagnanam; Leo H Bonati; Aad van der Lugt; H B van der Worp; Gert J de Borst; Willem Mali; Martin M Brown; Paul J Nederkoorn
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2016-11-04

6.  Morphological and hemodynamic patterns of carotid stenosis treated by endarterectomy with patch closure versus stenting: a duplex ultrasound study.

Authors:  Marcia Maria Morales; Alexandre Anacleto; Marcello Azem Buchdid; Paulo Ricardo Baggio Simeoni; Sergio Ledesma; Crescêncio Cêntola; João Carlos Anacleto; Marcela Aldrovani; Carlos Eli Piccinato
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  The current role of carotid duplex ultrasonography in the management of carotid atherosclerosis: foundations and advances.

Authors:  Kelly R Byrnes; Charles B Ross
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2012-03-07

Review 8.  Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: review and protocol for a diagnostic study.

Authors:  Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin M Brown
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 9.  Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Potential Therapeutic Application in Tissue Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Sonia Terriaca; Elena Fiorelli; Maria Giovanna Scioli; Giulia Fabbri; Gabriele Storti; Valerio Cervelli; Augusto Orlandi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Management of carotid stenosis. History and today.

Authors:  Małgorzata Szczerbo-Trojanowska; Tomasz Jargiełło; Anna Drelich-Zbroja
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2013-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.