Literature DB >> 1594346

Birth spacing and child health in urban Brazilian children.

S R Huttly1, C G Victora, F C Barros, J P Vaughan.   

Abstract

The associations between birth interval and a range of child health outcomes were examined in a population-based cohort of approximately 3500 urban Brazilian children. The effects of several socioeconomic and maternal confounding factors were controlled for in the analyses. Children born after shorter birth intervals (less than 18 and 18 through 23 months) were disadvantaged with respect to most of the health outcomes when compared with children born after intermediate birth intervals (24 through 35, 36 through 47, and 48 through 71 months). Effects were particularly marked for birth weight, postneonatal mortality, and anthropometric status at mean age 19 months. Children born after a long birth interval (greater than 71 months) also showed some disadvantage for birth weight, perinatal mortality, and infant mortality. However, this group experienced lower risks of hospitalizations during the first 19 months of life and better anthropometric status at mean age 19 months. This study provides data that are scarce from such settings and contributes to the quantification of associations between birth spacing and child health. This information is important in the planning of appropriate intervention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1594346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

Review 1.  Does birth spacing affect maternal or child nutritional status? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kathryn G Dewey; Roberta J Cohen
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Exploring the need for interventions to manage weight and stress during interconception.

Authors:  Jennifer Huberty; Jenn A Leiferman; Abbey R Kruper; Lisette T Jacobson; Molly E Waring; Jeni L Matthews; Danielle M Wischenka; Betty Braxter; Sara L Kornfield
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  The impact of birth spacing on subsequent feto-infant outcomes among community enrollees of a federal healthy start project.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Euna M August; Alfred K Mbah; Raymond J de Cuba; Amina P Alio; Vanessa Rowland-Mishkit; Estrellita Lo Berry
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-02

4.  Interpregnancy intervals and the risk for infant mortality: a case control study of Arizona infants 2003-2007.

Authors:  Khaleel S Hussaini; Douglas Ritenour; Dean V Coonrod
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-05

5.  Association between Birth Interval and Cardiovascular Outcomes at 30 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study from Brazil.

Authors:  D Devakumar; P C Hallal; B L Horta; F C Barros; J C K Wells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Birth Intervals and Health in Adulthood: A Comparison of Siblings Using Swedish Register Data.

Authors:  Kieron J Barclay; Martin Kolk
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-06

7.  An energy-saving development initiative increases birth rate and childhood malnutrition in rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mhairi A Gibson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Change in modifiable maternal characteristics and behaviours between consecutive pregnancies and offspring adiposity: A systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Taylor; Sam Wilding; Nida Ziauddeen; Keith M Godfrey; Ann Berrington; Nisreen A Alwan
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 10.867

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.