Literature DB >> 15942569

Significant value of autopsy for quality management in cardiac surgery.

Ardawan J Rastan1, Jan F Gummert, Nicole Lachmann, Thomas Walther, Dierck V Schmitt, Volkmar Falk, Nico Doll, Paul Caffier, Markus M Richter, Christian Wittekind, Friedrich W Mohr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With recent advances in diagnostic imaging, the value of autopsy has been called into question. The aim of our study was to assess the current impact of autopsy for early postoperative quality management in cardiac surgery.
METHODS: Between 2000 and 2003, a total of 14,313 patients underwent cardiac surgery at our center. Of these, 898 patients (6.3%) died, and autopsy was performed in 468 cases (52.1%). Data from clinical and postmortem examination were prospectively analyzed regarding causes of death, postoperative complications, concomitant diseases, and surgery-associated pathologic findings.
RESULTS: Mean age was 68.7 years. Mean survival was 13.9 postoperative days. On autopsy, causes of death were cardiac in 49.8% of cases (n = 233), respiratory in 8.3% (n = 39), cerebral in 6.4% (n = 30), abdominal in 4.7% (n = 22), multiorgan failure or sepsis in 14.9% (n = 70), pulmonary embolism in 6.6% (n = 31), procedure associated in 8.3% (n = 39), and others in 0.9% (n = 4). Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem determinations of cause of death were found in 108 cases (23.1%). These were acute myocardial infarction (n = 38), low cardiac output (n = 9), respiratory (n = 8), cerebral (n = 5), abdominal (n = 7), multiorgan failure or sepsis (n = 12), pulmonary embolism (n = 18), and procedure associated (11). Clinically unrecognized postoperative complications were found in 364 cases (77.8%). Unknown concomitant diseases were found in 464 cases (99.1%), with potential therapeutic relevance in 90 cases (19.2%). In 85 cases (18.2%), autopsy examination revealed 96 premortem unrecognized surgery-associated pathologic findings.
CONCLUSION: A high overall discrepancy rate between premortem and autopsy diagnoses was recognized. Autopsy revealed clinically relevant information in a significant number of cases. Therefore autopsy remains essential for quality assessment in perioperative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15942569     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  12 in total

Review 1.  Post mortem examinations after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  M F Hickling; D E Pontefract; P J Gallagher; S A Livesey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  [Evaluation of the clinical utility of autopsy: an investigation at the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Leipzig].

Authors:  K Nestler; T Gradistanac; C Wittekind
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  [Autopsy as a tool for quality assurance: Leipzig].

Authors:  T Gradistanac; C Wittekind
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  [Autopsy-a procedure of medical history?].

Authors:  K Petros; C Wittekind
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  [Proposals for standardization of autopsy reports].

Authors:  C Wittekind; J-O Habeck; T Gradistanac
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Autopsy and clinical discrepancies in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case series-a step towards understanding "Why"?

Authors:  Chadi Aludaat; Matthieu Sarsam; Fabien Doguet; Jean-Marc Baste
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Learning by doing, scale effects, or neither? Cardiac surgeons after residency.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Association of bleeding and thrombosis with outcome in extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Heidi J Dalton; Pamela Garcia-Filion; Richard Holubkov; Frank W Moler; Thomas Shanley; Sabrina Heidemann; Kathleen Meert; Robert A Berg; John Berger; Joseph Carcillo; Christopher Newth; Richard Harrison; Allan Doctor; Peter Rycus; J Michael Dean; Tammara Jenkins; Carol Nicholson
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Analysis of risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients after thoracic surgery: A clinical study of 167 cases.

Authors:  Wang Fei; Zhang Jian; Gao Zhi; Wang Rong; Li Jianxin; Gu Yongquan; Wang Weiping
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 0.332

Review 10.  Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Benefits and Risks of Thromboprophylaxis After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Ebrahim Bham; Warren Pavey
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.