BACKGROUND:Inadequate blood pressure (BP) control could be due to incorrect management of hypertensives caused by the lack of interaction between general practitioners (GP) and hypertension specialists. OBJECTIVES: To test the effectiveness on BP and total cardiovascular risk (TCVR) control of an internet-based digital network connecting specialists and GPs. METHODS: We created a network among the Hypertension Clinic, Federico II University (Naples, Italy), 23 hospital-based hypertension clinics and 60 GPs from the area (CampaniaSalute Network, CS). Randomized GPs enrolled in CS could update online records of patients (n = 1979). As a control, we included 2045 patients referred to the specialist clinics by GPs from outside the network. All patients completed a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: CS provided a larger reduction in BP [systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP): 7.3 +/- 0.4/5.4 +/- 0.3 versus 4.1 +/- 0.4/3.1 +/- 0.26 mmHg, CS versus control; P < 0.001 for both] and percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 mmHg (CS versus control: baseline, 33 versus 34%, NS; end of follow-up, 51 versus 47%, chi = 13.371; P < 0.001). A European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) TCVR score was calculated [from 1 (average) to 5 (very high TCVR)]. The CS group showed a reduction in the mean TCVR score (CS: from 3.5 +/- 0.02 to 3.2 +/- 0, P < 0.01, ANOVA; control group: 3.5 +/- 0.03 to 3.4 +/- 0.03, NS) and, accordingly, fatal and non-fatal major cardiovascular events (MACE) were less frequent (2.9 versus 4.3%; chi = 5.047, P < 0.02). CS predicts fewer MACE in multiple binary regression analysis (beta:-7.27, P < 0.008) reducing the risk for MACE compared to control [odds ratio (OR): 0.838; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.96]. CONCLUSION: Our results support the idea that telemedicine can achieve better control of BP and TCVR.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Inadequate blood pressure (BP) control could be due to incorrect management of hypertensives caused by the lack of interaction between general practitioners (GP) and hypertension specialists. OBJECTIVES: To test the effectiveness on BP and total cardiovascular risk (TCVR) control of an internet-based digital network connecting specialists and GPs. METHODS: We created a network among the Hypertension Clinic, Federico II University (Naples, Italy), 23 hospital-based hypertension clinics and 60 GPs from the area (CampaniaSalute Network, CS). Randomized GPs enrolled in CS could update online records of patients (n = 1979). As a control, we included 2045 patients referred to the specialist clinics by GPs from outside the network. All patients completed a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS:CS provided a larger reduction in BP [systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP): 7.3 +/- 0.4/5.4 +/- 0.3 versus 4.1 +/- 0.4/3.1 +/- 0.26 mmHg, CS versus control; P < 0.001 for both] and percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 mmHg (CS versus control: baseline, 33 versus 34%, NS; end of follow-up, 51 versus 47%, chi = 13.371; P < 0.001). A European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) TCVR score was calculated [from 1 (average) to 5 (very high TCVR)]. The CS group showed a reduction in the mean TCVR score (CS: from 3.5 +/- 0.02 to 3.2 +/- 0, P < 0.01, ANOVA; control group: 3.5 +/- 0.03 to 3.4 +/- 0.03, NS) and, accordingly, fatal and non-fatal major cardiovascular events (MACE) were less frequent (2.9 versus 4.3%; chi = 5.047, P < 0.02). CS predicts fewer MACE in multiple binary regression analysis (beta:-7.27, P < 0.008) reducing the risk for MACE compared to control [odds ratio (OR): 0.838; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.96]. CONCLUSION: Our results support the idea that telemedicine can achieve better control of BP and TCVR.
Authors: Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Teresa Migliore; Francesco Rozza; Marina Marino; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina De Marco; Giovanni de Simone; Nicola De Luca Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2014-06-24
Authors: Francesco Rozza; Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Mario Santoro; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina Marino; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Bruno Trimarco Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2013-05-09
Authors: Eugenio Stabile; Raffaele Izzo; Francesco Rozza; Maria Angela Losi; Nicola De Luca; Bruno Trimarco Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2017-07-01
Authors: R Esposito; R Izzo; M Galderisi; M De Marco; E Stabile; G Esposito; V Trimarco; F Rozza; N De Luca; G de Simone Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Martina Chittani; Roberta Zaninello; Chiara Lanzani; Francesca Frau; Maria F Ortu; Erika Salvi; Giovanni Fresu; Lorena Citterio; Daniele Braga; Daniela A Piras; Simona Delli Carpini; Dinesh Velayutham; Marco Simonini; Giuseppe Argiolas; Simona Pozzoli; Chiara Troffa; Valeria Glorioso; Kimmo K Kontula; Timo P Hiltunen; Kati M Donner; Stephen T Turner; Eric Boerwinkle; Arlene B Chapman; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Anna F Dominiczak; Olle Melander; Julie A Johnson; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff; Yan Gong; Natalia V Rivera; Gianluigi Condorelli; Bruno Trimarco; Paolo Manunta; Daniele Cusi; Nicola Glorioso; Cristina Barlassina Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Raffaele Izzo; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Nicola De Luca; Valentina Trimarco; Francesco Buono; Salvatore Crispo; Renata Giudice; Frazer Lowe; Mike McEwan; Francesco Rozza; Antonella Bassi; Alfredo Nunziata; Lucio Annunziato; Bruno Trimarco Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2013-01-22
Authors: Renata Giudice; Raffaele Izzo; Maria Virgina Manzi; Giampiero Pagnano; Mario Santoro; Maria Assunta Elena Rao; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Nicola De Luca; Valentina Trimarco Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2012-06-01
Authors: Giovanni de Simone; Richard B Devereux; Raffaele Izzo; Daniela Girfoglio; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Mary J Roman Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Raffaele Izzo; Giovanni de Simone; Marcello Chinali; Guido Iaccarino; Valentina Trimarco; Francesco Rozza; Renata Giudice; Bruno Trimarco; Nicola De Luca Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 19.112