| Literature DB >> 15941781 |
Guy E Alvarez1, Brenda M Davy, Tasha P Ballard, Stacy D Beske, Kevin P Davy.
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that reductions in total body and abdominal visceral fat with energy restriction would be associated with increases in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in overweight/obese older men. To address this, overweight/obese (25 < or = body mass index < or = 35 kg/m(2)) young (OB-Y, n = 10, age = 32.9 +/- 2.3 yr) and older (OB-O, n = 6, age = 60 +/- 2.7 yr) men underwent 3 mo of energy restriction at a level designed to reduce body weight by 5-10%. Cardiovagal BRS (modified Oxford technique), body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and abdominal fat distribution (computed tomography) were measured in the overweight/obese men before weight loss and after 4 wk of weight stability at their reduced weight and compared with a group of nonobese young men (NO-Y, n = 13, age = 21.1 +/- 1.0 yr). Before weight loss, cardiovagal BRS was approximately 35% and approximately 60% lower (P < 0.05) in the OB-Y and OB-O compared with NO-Y. Body weight (-7.8 +/- 1.1 vs. -7.3 +/- 0.7 kg), total fat mass (-4.1 +/- 1.0 vs. -4.4 +/- 0.8 kg), and abdominal visceral fat (-27.6 +/- 6.9 vs. -43.5 +/- 10.1 cm(2)) were reduced (all P < 0.05) after weight loss, but the magnitude of reduction did not differ (all P > 0.05) between OB-Y and OB-O, respectively. Cardiovagal BRS increased (11.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 18.5 +/- 2.6 ms/mmHg and 6.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 12.8 +/- 4.2 ms/mmHg) after weight loss (both P < 0.05) in OB-Y and OB-O, respectively. After weight loss, cardiovagal BRS in the obese/overweight young and older men was approximately 105% and approximately 73% (P > 0.05) of NO-Y (17.5 +/- 2.2 ms/mmHg). Therefore, the results of this study indicate that weight loss increases the sensitivity of the cardiovagal baroreflex in overweight/obese young and older men.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15941781 DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00487.2004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0193-1849 Impact factor: 4.310